green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Castle Rock Entertainment v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc.
See Salinger v. Random House, 811 F.2d 90, 99 (2d Cir.) (finding that quantitatively modest excerpting from plaintiffs personal letters was substantial where those excerpts, “[t]o a large extent, [made defendant’s] book worth reading.”), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); see also Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. v. Brown, 223 F.Supp. 219, 223-24 (E.D.N.Y.1963) (stressing that defendant’s book, a manual consisting of the answers to a set of physics problems included in plaintiffs college course book, had “no independent viability.”); Midway Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Random House, Inc.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 96-97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Craft v. Kohler, 667 F.Supp. 120, 123 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norse v. Henry Holt and Co.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 96 (2d Cir.1987), *146 cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell, 803 F.2d 1253, 1262 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1059 , 107 S.Ct. 2201 , 95 L.Ed.2d 856 (1987); and Wright v. Warner Books, Inc., 953 F.2d 731, 736 (2d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987). 20 We have found fair use in works that are plainly "commercial." See Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir.1983) (advertisement disclosing Consumer Reports recommendation), reh'g denied, 730 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Warner Bros., Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 720 F.2d 231, 242 (2d Cir.1983) (television series parodying Superman); Elsm…
cited
Cited "see"
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Campbell
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 98 (2d Cir.), reh'g denied, 818 F.2d 252 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Campbell
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 98 (2d Cir.), reh'g denied, 818 F.2d 252 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arica Institute, Inc. v. Helen Palmer and Harper & Row Publishers, Incorporated
See Arica, 770 F.Supp. at 191-92 ; accord Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 98 (2d Cir.), cert. den. 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); 1 Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B] at 2-16.
discussed
Cited "see"
Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
See Maxtone-Graham, 803 F.2d at 1263 . “[W]hat is relevant is the amount and substantiality of the copyrighted expression that has been used, not the factual content of the material in the copyrighted works.” Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 97 (2d Cir.) (emphasis in original), reh’g denied, 818 F.2d 252 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brody v. Spang
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 818 F.2d 252, 253 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brody v. Spang
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 818 F.2d 252, 253 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arica Institute, Inc. v. Palmer
(2×)
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 98 (2d Cir.) (cliche or ordinary word combination), reh’g denied, 818 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Alberto-Culver Co. v. Andrea Dumon, Inc., 466 F.2d 705, 711 (7th Cir.1972) (advertising slogan not copyrightable); Magic Mktg., Inc. v. Mailing Servs. of Pittsburgh, Inc., 634 F.Supp. 769 (W.D.Pa.1986) (envelopes describing contents with phrases such as “PRIORITY MESSAGE” or “GIFT CHECK” not copyrightable).
discussed
Cited "see"
District of Columbia v. Forsman
Accord, Akins v. District of Columbia, 526 A.2d 933, 935 (D.C.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306, 1310-11 (D.C.1983) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Era Publications International, Aps, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carol Publishing Group, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987); New Era Publications Int’l, ApS v. Henry Holt & Co., 873 F.2d 576 (2d Cir.), petition for reh’g denied, 884 F.2d 659 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Era Publications International, Aps v. Henry Holt, Co.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 97 (2d Cir.) ("we agree with the District Court that the first fair use factor weighs in [the biographer's] favor, but not that the purpose of his use entitles him to any special consideration"), reh'g denied, 818 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Era Publications International v. Henry Holt, Co.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 97 (2d Cir.) (“we agree with the District Court that the first fair use factor weighs in [the biographer’s] favor, but not that the purpose of his use entitles him to any special consideration”), reh’g denied, 818 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schreier v. Weight Watchers Northeast Region, Inc.
Corp. v. Edelstein, 526 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.1975) (absent extraordinary circumstances, federal appellate courts will not consider evidence that is not part of the trial record); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974 , 998 n. 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1018 , 96 S.Ct. 453 , 46 L.Ed.2d 389 (1975) (papers not called to the attention of the district court at trial are not properly before the appeals court); Republic Gear Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 381 F.2d 551 , 557 n. 5 (2d Cir.1967) (an exhibit that was not before the district court judge is not part of the appellate record); Dicto…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lafontant v. Aristide
See also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, John Doe # 700, 817 F.2d 1108, 1111 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 212 , 98 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987) (declining to decide whether head-of-state immunity extends to unauthorized acts carried out during Mr.- Marcos’ term or whether it would have been limited to official authorized acts).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erato
No. 1580, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. (1964), reprinted in 1964 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3782, 3790; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Doe # 700, 817 F.2d 1108, 1112 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 212 , 98 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Subpoena Issued to Mary Erato Pursuant to a Request of the Netherlands Pursuant to the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Kingdom of the Netherlands on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1782 in the Matter of John Michele Erato and Victoria Erato-Aeillo, United States of America v. Mary Erato, Witness-Appellant, John Michele Erato and Victoria Erato-Aeillo
No. 1580, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. (1964), reprinted in 1964 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3782, 3790; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, Doe # 700, 817 F.2d 1108, 1112 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 212 , 98 L.Ed.2d 176 (1987). 23 Erato contends that the purpose of the emphasized sentence in Article 5 was simply to leave to the Requested State the decision of which privileges to apply.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arica Institute, Inc. v. Palmer
See also Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 98 (2d Cir.) (copyright protects a “sequence of creative expression” but not an ordinary phrase in isolation), reh’g denied, 818 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moreno
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 87-5066.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1987.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.