Boyle v. United Tech. Corp., 485 U.S. 931 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Boyle v. United Tech. Corp., 485 U.S. 931 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where a defendant is on notice of the 25 facts contained in an amendment to a complaint, there is no serious prejudice to defendant in 26 allowing the amendment.”
51 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Macias v. KDF Foxdale, L.P. (cand, 2020-05-01) · Strongest negative: Craig Chestnut v. City of Lowell (ca1, 2002-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Craig Chestnut v. City of Lowell
1st Cir. · 2002 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Williams v. Butler, 746 F.2d 431, 443-44 (8th Cir.1984) (affirming district court decision to set aside § 1983 punitive damages award despite failure to object to punitive damages instruction at trial), on reh'g, 762 F.2d 73 (8th Cir.1985) (en banc), vacated on other grounds sub nom., City of Little Rock v. Williams, 475 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 1508 , 89 L.Ed.2d 909 (1986), on remand, Williams v. Butler, 802 F.2d 296 (8th Cir.1986) (en banc), vacated on other grounds sub nom., City of Little Rock v. Williams, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988), on remand Williams v. B…
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Macias v. KDF Foxdale, L.P.
N.D. Cal. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
where a defendant is on notice of the 25 facts contained in an amendment to a complaint, there is no serious prejudice to defendant in 26 allowing the amendment.
discussed Cited "see" Psa v. Port of Tacoma
9th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 813 F.2d 1480, 1488 (9th Cir. 1987) (“The state’s method of adopting a more stringent standard should be subject to scrutiny only at the permit issuance stage.”), vacated, 485 U.S. 931 (1988), reinstated as amended, 853 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1988).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Allegheny Ludlum
3rd Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 , 1317(d). other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 (1988), where In assessing a civil penalty for a violation the Court of Appeals held that a CWA of § 1311 or § 1317, the court must defendant could not escape liability based consider: “the seriousness of the violation on alleged sampling violations.
cited Cited "see" Texas v. New Mexico
SCOTUS · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See South Carolina v. Baker, 484 U.S. 973 , 108 S.Ct. 482 , 98 L.Ed.2d 481 (1987), and Kansas v. Colorado, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1103 , 99 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Act uses two water-quality-performance standards, by which a discharger of water may be evaluated — “effluent limitations” and “water quality standards.” Arkansas v. Oklahoma, 503 U.S. at 101 , 112 S.Ct. 1046 (citing 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 , 1313, 1314); see also Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of Calif., 813 F.2d 1480, 1483 (9th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988), reinstated, 853 F.2d 667 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Federal Insurance Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Act uses two water-quality-performance standards, by which a discharger of water may be evaluated—“effluent lim- itations” and “water quality standards.” Arkansas v. Okla- homa, 503 U.S. at 101 (citing 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 , 1313, 1314); see also Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of Calif., 813 F.2d 1480, 1483 (9th Cir. 1987), vacated on other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 (1988), reinstated, 853 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Act uses two water-quality-performance standards, by which a discharger of water may be evaluated — “effluent limitations” and “water quality standards.” Arkansas v. Oklahoma, 503 U.S. at 101 , 112 S.Ct. 1046 (citing 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 , 1313, 1314); see also Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of Calif, 813 F.2d 1480, 1483 (9th Cir.1987), vacated on other grounds, 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988), reinstated, 853 F.2d 667 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc. (2×)
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rather, in evalu- ating undue delay, we also inquire “whether the moving party knew or should have known the facts and theories raised by the amendment in the original pleading.” Jackson, 902 F.2d at 1388 ; see also Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of California, 813 F.2d 1480, 1492-93 (9th Cir. 1987), vacated on other grounds by Union Oil Co. of California v. Sierra Club, 485 U.S. 931 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.
N.D. Cal. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co., 813 F.2d 1480, 1491-92 (9th Cir.1987) (holding that required self-monitoring reports constitute conclusive evidence of an exceedance of an NPDES permit limitation), vacated on other grounds by 485 U.S. 931 , 108 S.Ct. 1102 , 99 L.Ed.2d 264 (1988); United States v. CPS Chem.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boyle, Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of Boyle
v.
United Technologies Corp.
No. 86-492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1988.
485 U.S. 931
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 479 U. S. 1029.] Parties may file supplemental briefs on reargument, provided the briefs do not exceed 20 pages. Amici curiae may file supplemental briefs on reargument, provided the briefs do not exceed 10 pages. Such[*932] briefs shall be served and filed on or before close of business Wednesday, April 13, 1988.