using identical language to define probable cause
- Commonwealth v. Tony Sirrell Mann, No. 2047954 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 1996).unpublished(using identical language to define probable cause)
- Herbert Lee Evans v. Commonwealth, No. 0577942 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 1995).unpublished(using identical language to define probable cause)
Other citing cases
- James v. State, 356 S.W.3d 728 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011).published
- Commonwealth v. Silva, 31 N.E.3d 1092 (Mass. 2015).published
- Charles Michael Kight v. Harry K. Singletary, 50 F.3d 1539 (11th Cir. 1995).published
- Barnard v. Collins, 13 F.3d 871 (5th Cir. 1994).published
- Thomas Dean Stevens v. Walter D. Zant, 968 F.2d 1076 (11th Cir. 1992).published
- DeLong v. Thompson, 790 F. Supp. 594 (E.D. Va. 1991).published
- Cox v. State, 585 So. 2d 182 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991).published
- Commonwealth v. Nocero, 582 A.2d 376 (Pa. 1990).published
- Schwarck v. State, 568 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).published
- Smith v. State, 581 So. 2d 497 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990).published
Show 18 more citing cases
- Holladay v. State, 549 So. 2d 122 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988).published
- Daquan Lamar Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 809 S.E.2d 254 (Va. Ct. App. 2018).published
- Commonwealth v. Douglas Edward Marek, No. 2123024 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 5, 2003).unpublished
- Woods v. State, 789 So. 2d 896 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999).published
- Ingram v. State, 779 So. 2d 1225 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999).published
- Williams v. State, 710 So. 2d 1276 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996).published
- Castillo v. State, 913 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).published
- Commonwealth v. LaCava, 666 A.2d 221 (Pa. 1995).published
- Royal v. Commonwealth, 458 S.E.2d 575 (Va. 1995).published
- Powell v. State, 897 S.W.2d 307 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).published
- Jones v. State, 612 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 1992).published
- People v. Dist. Court, 834 P.2d 181 (Colo. 1992).published
- Molitor v. State, 827 S.W.2d 512 (Tex. App.—Austin 1992).published
- Watts v. State, 593 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1992).published
- Harris v. Com., 400 S.E.2d 191 (Va. 1991).published
- Kuenzel v. State, 577 So. 2d 474 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990).published
- Shearer v. Commonwealth, 388 S.E.2d 828 (Va. Ct. App. 1990).published
- People v. Crusoe, 449 N.W.2d 641 (Mich. 1989).published
v.
Florida Barnard v. Texas Clayton v. Pennsylvania Ghent v. California Hays v. Alabama Davis v. Kemp, Warden Kight v. Florida DeLong v. Virginia
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Fla.; Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; Sup. Ct. Pa.; Sup. Ct. Cal.; Sup. Ct. Ala.; C. A. 11th Cir.; Sup. Ct. Fla.; and Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.