green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2010 ·
…hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nale v. FORD MOTOR CO. UAW RETIREMENT PLAN
hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bragg v. ABN AMRO North America, Inc.
hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.
cited
Cited "see"
E.E. v. O.M.G.R.
See McIntyre v. Crouch, 98 Or.App. 462 , 780 P.2d 239 (1989), cert. denied 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miles v. State
(2×)
See State v. Crutchfield, 318 Md. 200, 207-08 , 567 A.2d 449, 452-53 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1926 , 109 L.Ed.2d 289 (1990) (quoting United States v. Perez, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 579, 580 , 6 L.Ed. 165 (1824)).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Physician Corp. of America Securities Litigation
See Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F.2d 723, 728 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Alvarez v. Commonwealth
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 532, 544 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 483 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Grellan J. Harty v. Commonwealth
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 532, 542 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 482 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bynum v. Commonwealth
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 532, 540 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 481 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Shears v. Commonwealth
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 532, 538-39 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 480 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Gold Kist, Inc.
See Ross v. Bank South, N.A. , 837 F.2d 980 (11th Cir. 1988), rehearing granted and opinion vacated, 848 F.2d 1132 (11th Cir. 1988), on rehearing, 885 F.2d 723 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barrett v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 532, 537-38 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 480 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ealy
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 248-49 (1973); accord Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 532, 540 , 383 S,E.2d 476, 481 (1989)(en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jacques v. Commonwealth
See Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 532, 540 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 481 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sause and Schnitzer
See, e.g., McIntyre v. Crouch, 98 Or App 462, 472 , 780 P2d 239 , rev den, 308 Or 593 (1989), cert den, 495 US 905 (1990) (holding that Oregon statute either did not or constitutionally could not prevent an unmarried sperm contributor in AI from establishing parental rights through contract with the birthing parent); Leckie and Voorhies, 128 Or App 289, 293 , 875 P2d 521 (1994) (enforcing AI contract barring donor from asserting parental rights); In re Adoption of Baby A and Baby B, 128 Or App 450, 453 , 877 P2d 107 (1994) (payment of money to a birth mother pur- suant to a surrogacy contract …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sause and Schnitzer
See, e.g., McIntyre v. Crouch, 98 Or App 462, 472 , 780 P2d 239 , rev den, 308 Or 593 (1989), cert den, 495 US 905 (1990) (holding that Oregon statute either did not or constitutionally could not prevent an unmarried sperm contributor in AI from establishing parental rights through contract with the birthing parent); Leckie and Voorhies, 128 Or App 289, 293 , 875 P2d 521 (1994) (enforcing AI contract barring donor from asserting parental rights); In re Adoption of Baby A and Baby B, 128 Or App 450, 453 , 877 P2d 107 (1994) (payment of money to a birth mother pur- suant to a surrogacy contract …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sause and Schnitzer
See, e.g., McIntyre v. Crouch, 98 Or App 462, 472 , 780 P2d 239 , rev den, 308 Or 593 (1989), cert den, 495 US 905 (1990) (holding that Oregon statute either did not or constitutionally could not prevent an unmarried sperm contributor in AI from establishing parental rights through contract with the birthing parent); Leckie and Voorhies, 128 Or App 289, 293 , 875 P2d 521 (1994) (enforcing AI contract barring donor from asserting parental rights); In re Adoption of Baby A and Baby B, 128 Or App 450, 453 , 877 P2d 107 (1994) (payment of money to a birth mother pur- suant to a surrogacy contract …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re HealthSouth Corp. Securities Litigation
To establish a cause of action for violation of Rule 10b-5, the plaintiffs must establish: “ ‘(1) false representation of a material fact (2) made with scienter (3) upon which the plaintiff justifiably relied 16 (4) that proximately caused the plaintiffs damages.’ ” Friedlander v. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, 788 F.2d 1500 , 1503 n. 3 (11th Cir.1986) (quoting Diamond v. Lamotte, 709 F.2d 1419, 1422-23 (11th Cir.1983) (citations omitted)); see also Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F.2d 723, 728 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re HealthSouth Corp. Securities Litigation
To establish a cause of action for violation of Rule 10(b)-5, the plaintiffs must establish: “‘(1) false representation of a material fact (2) made with scienter (3) upon which the plaintiff justifiably relied 10 (4) that proximately caused the plaintiffs damages.’ ” Friedlander v. Trout-man, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, 788 F.2d 1500, 1503 n. 3 (11th Cir.1986) (quoting Diamond v. Lamotte, 709 F.2d 1419, 1422-23 (11th Cir.1983)) (citations omitted); see also Ross v. Bank South, N.A, 885 F.2d 723, 728 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amy Michelle Nelson v. Commonwealth
Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463, 470-71 , 105 S.Ct. 2778, 2782-83 , 86 L.Ed.2d 370 (1985); see also Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 532, 538 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 480 (1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leroy Leo Edmunds, Jr. v. Commonwealth
Bethea v. Commonwealth, 245 Va. 416, 419 , 429 - 3 - S.E.2d 211, 213 (1993); see also Limonja v. Commonwealth, 7 Va. App. 416, 424 , 375 S.E.2d 12, 16-17 (1988) (stating that after receiving consent to search the vehicle, the officers "had [the occupants] exit the car and stand to the rear"), aff'd en banc, 8 Va. App. 532 , 383 S.E.2d 476 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S. Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Jones
See also Silva v. MacLaine, 697 F.Supp. 1423, 1430 (E.D.Mich.1988), aff'd, 888 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 289 (1990); Pamfiloff v. Giant Records, Inc., 794 F.Supp. 933, 938-39 (N.D.Cal.1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank M. Ockerman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, (92-5265) v. May Zima & Company, (92-5266)
See, e.g., Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F.2d 723 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990); T.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Com.
The record thus discloses that police "`diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly, during which time it was necessary to detain the defendant.'" DePriest, 4 Va.App. at 587 , 359 S.E.2d at 545 (quoting Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 686 , 105 S.Ct. at 1575 ); see also Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 532, 542 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 482 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1925 , 109 L.Ed.2d 288 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Commonwealth
The record thus discloses that police “ ‘diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly, during which time it was necessary to detain the defendant.’ ” DePriest, 4 Va. App. at 587 , 359 S.E.2d at 545 (quoting Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 686 ); see also Limonja v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 532, 542 , 383 S.E.2d 476, 482 (1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooke v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.
While securities claims are often fact-specific and properly resolved by a jury, “summary judgment may be granted in appropriate cases.” In re Apple, 886 F.2d at 1113 (affirming in part a grant of summary judgment in a securities fraud action); see also Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F.2d 723, 731 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc) (sustaining summary judgment in securities fraud action), ce rt. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,652
B. 16 While securities claims are often fact-specific and properly resolved by a jury, "summary judgment may be granted in appropriate cases." In re Apple, 886 F.2d at 1113 (affirming in part a grant of summary judgment in a securities fraud action); see also Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 885 F.2d 723, 731 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc) (sustaining summary judgment in securities fraud action), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 905 , 110 S.Ct. 1924 , 109 L.Ed.2d 287 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Limonja
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
No. 89-1457.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1990.
495 U.S. 905
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (2)
Ct. App. Va. Certiorari denied.