green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“because it is a form of judgment, a consent decree must conform to applicable laws”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ho by Ho v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.
because it is a form of judgment, a consent decree must conform to applicable laws
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gollapudi
Accord United States v. Musacchia, 900 F.2d 493, 500 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 (1991) (holding that six-year statute of limitations in S 6531(4) is applicable to violations of S 7202); United States v. Porth, 426 F.2d 519, 522 (10th Cir.) (finding that S 7202 was "clearly within the six-year exception to the general three-year statute of limitations of S 6531"), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rao Gollapudi
(2×)
Accord United States v. Musacchia, 900 F.2d 493, 500 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1991) (holding that six-year statute of limitations in § 6531(4) is applicable to violations of § 7202); United States v. Porth, 426 F.2d 519, 522 (10th Cir.) (finding that § 7202 was "clearly within the six-year exception to the general three-year statute of limitations of § 6531"), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824 , 91 S.Ct. 47 , 27 L.Ed.2d 53 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Immunity of Smithsonian Institution From State Insurance Laws
See United States v. City o f Spokane, 918 F.2d 84 (9th Cir. 1990), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1250 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keith v. Volpe
See United States v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 582 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991) (adopting the "growing rule., that the trial court may limit its proceeding to whatever is necessary to aid it in reaching an informed, just and reasoned decision.”) 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ramsey v. Kantor
See United States v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 579 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Janus Petroleum Co., Inc. v. United States
See United States v. Musacchia, 900 F.2d 493, 495-96 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1991) (describing a typical “daisy chain” scheme for evading the tax).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marks v. CDW Computer Centers, Inc.
See Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing Co., 908 F.2d 1385, 1387-88 (7th Cir.1990) (discussing the history of this Circuit’s adoption of state and federal statutes of limitation), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See United States v. City of Spokane, 918 F.2d 84, 86 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 (1991) (de novo review when mixed question implicates constitutional rights). 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b) provides that "[a]ny party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury...." Rule 38(d) further states "A demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the parties." Such consent may be found if "the parties or their attorneys of record, by written stipulation filed with the court or by an oral stipulation made i…
cited
Cited "see"
Nerac, Inc. v. Meehan
See United States v. Spokane, 918 F.2d 84, 87-88 (9th Cir. 1990), *342 cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S. Ct. 2888 , 115 L.
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1994
See United States v. Oregon, 699 F.Supp. 1456 (D.Or.1988), aff'd, 913 F.2d 576 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Brown
See United States v. Oregon, 699 F.Supp. 1456 (D.Or.1988), aff'd, 913 F.2d 576 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop Corporation
See United States v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 588-89 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 *720 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkinson v. Torres
(2×)
Because the reasonableness of the use of deadly force is an extremely fact intensive inquiry, “the propriety of a particular use of force is generally an issue for the jury.” Chew v. Gates, 27 F.3d 1432, 1440 (9th Cir.1994); see also Reed v. Hoy, 909 F.2d 324, 329-30 (9th Cir.1989) cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pacific National Cellular v. United States
See 44 U.S.C. § 3507 (a), (f); see also United States v. Weiss, 914 F.2d 1514, 1520-21 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied sub nom., Gleicher v. United States, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2888 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1991) (quoting United States v. Smith, 866 F.2d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir.1989)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gotti
See, e.g., United States v. Musacchia, 900 F.2d 493, 497 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Citizens for a Better Environment v. Gorsuch, 718 F.2d 1117, 1126 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1219, 104 S.Ct. 2668 , 81 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); see also United States v. Oregon, 913 F.2d 576, 580 (9th Cir.1990) (before approving consent decree, district court must be satisfied that decree is fundamentally fair, adequate and reasonable, and in conformity with applicable laws), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2889 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.
See Lampf Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson, 501 U.S. 350 , 111 S.Ct. 2773 , 115 L.Ed.2d 321 (1991); Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co., supra; see also Short v. Belleville Shoe Manufacturing Co., 908 F.2d 1385 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McRae v. Tena
See, e.g., Reed v. Hoy, 909 F.2d 324 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1250 , 111 S.Ct. 2887 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keen A. Umbehr v. Joe McClure Glen Heiser, and George Spencer
Oct. 17, 1994) (holding that independent contractor claiming termination of contract in retaliation for petition was not protected by First Amendment); O’Hare Truck Serv., Inc. v. City of Northlake, 843 F.Supp. 1231, 1234 (N.D.Ill.1994) (holding that independent contractor claiming removal from city towing rotation list because of political affiliation was not protected by First Amendment); Inner City Leasing and Trucking Co. v. City of Gary, 759 F.Supp. 461, 464 (N.D.Ind.1990) (holding that independent contractor claiming termination of contract because of political affiliation not protecte…
Levin
v.
Florida Bar
v.
Florida Bar
No. 90-1456.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1991.
501 U.S. 1250
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certio-rari denied.