green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority v. Zoning Hearing Board of London Grove Township
See Harvey & Harvey, Inc. v. County of Chester, 68 F.3d 788 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1265 , 134 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
800 Services Inc. v. AT & T Corp.
See Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 60 F.3d 1010, 1012 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Trautman v. Lagalski
See Nelson v. County of Allegheny, *329 60 F.3d 1010, 1012 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Arkansas Right To Life State Political Action Committee v. Brad Butler
See Boyle v. Anderson, 68 F.3d 1093, 1100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 214 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
John v. Wolfe, Trustee, Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Gilmour Manufacturing Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See Boyle v. Anderson, 68 F.3d 1093, 1100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 214 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nielsen
See In re Gafford, 127 Idaho 472 , 903 P.2d 61 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1265 , 134 L.Ed.2d 212 (1996), and In re Nielsen, 127 Idaho 449 , 902 P.2d 474 (1995) (hereinafter cited as Nielsen I).
cited
Cited "see"
Arkansas Right to Life State Political Action Committee v. Butler
See Boyle v. Anderson, 68 F.3d 1093, 1100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 214 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Ron Russell v. Troy Burris
See Boyle v. Anderson, 68 F.3d 1093, 1100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 214 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
John v. Wolfe v. Gilmour Mfg. Co.
See Boyle v. Anderson, 68 F.3d 1093, 1100 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.
See Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 860 F.Supp. 1080, 1084 (W.D.Pa.1994) (“In our view, ... once certification has been denied by the district court, class members cannot reasonably rely on the existence of the suit to protect their rights, and they must timely assert claims in their individual capacities.”), aff'd, 60 F.3d 1010 (3d Cir.1995) (reviewing state law and holding that, in federal courts, the tolling of the statute of limitations ceases upon the entry of the district court’s order denying class certification, and does not continue through completion of the appeals process), ce …
discussed
Cited "see"
76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1007, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,338, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1240 David M. Armstrong, L. Benson Barger, Wallace D. Black, Howard Brooks, Jerry A. Budd, Sonja M. Carter, Dominick C. Cizek, Carol D. Clarke-Iley, Charles H. Davis, Kenneth O. Giessuebel, Herold P. Glaser, Robert A. Havlish, Kumar Hinduja, Joseph C. Jett, Glenn E. Johnson, Robert C. Lerche, Calvin N. Lightner, George W. McGuirk James W. McLean William G. Murphy, Donald L. Prasky, Clark C. Rains, Kenneth A. Richards, Russell G. Roberts, Linda L. Ryan, Victor W. Shaw, Linton W. Smith, Michael Sylvestri, Delbert S. Turner, Edward W. Walsh, Joseph W. Williamson v. Martin Marietta Corp., Martin Marietta Technologies, Inc.
See Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 860 F.Supp. 1080, 1084 (W.D.Pa.1994) ("In our view, ... once certification has been denied by the district court, class members cannot reasonably rely on the existence of the suit to protect their rights, and they must timely assert claims in their individual capacities."), aff'd, 60 F.3d 1010 (3d Cir.1995) (reviewing state law and holding that, in federal courts, the tolling of the statute of limitations ceases upon the entry of the district court's order denying class certification, and does not continue through completion of the appeals process), cert. den…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Basova v. Ashcroft
See, e.g., Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 60 F.3d 1010, 1014 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996); In re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Sec.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scarvey v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Charlotte
See also, Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 60 F.3d 1010, 1013 (3d Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 134 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Vaughn
Sav. & Loan of Phila., 119 F.R.D. 13, 15 (E.D.Pa.1988)); see also Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 60 F.3d 1010, 1015 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1173 , 116 S.Ct. 1266 , 134 L.Ed.2d 213 (1996) (recognizing that the relation back provision of Rule 15(c) “ameliorates” the effect of a statute of limitations but denying motion to amend pleadings).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Maryland
v.
Maryland
No. 95-1131.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1996.
Published
Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.