green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kwiatkowski v. Drews
See Guarino v. Interactive Objects, Inc., 122 Wash.App. 95, 122 , 86 P.3d 1175 (2004) (discussing and stating in dicta that it "[does] not disagree" with conclusion in Mergens v. Dreyfoos, 166 F.3d 1114, 1118 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 55 (1999)), which held that in the context of a contentious adversarial relationship, reliance on misrepresentations or omissions is unreasonable as a matter of law between the parties negotiating a settlement agreement, review denied, 153 Wash.2d 1024 , 110 P.3d 756 (2005). ¶ 31 Similarly, Kwiatkowski's argument that t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Forest Park II v. Katherine Hadley
See Cienega Gardens v. United States, 194 F.3d 1231, 1234-35 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 62 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999), for a basic overview of the relevant federal housing programs. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Chancellor Manor, Gateway Investors, Ltd., and Oak Grove Towers Associates v. United States
See Cienega Gardens v. United States, 194 F.3d 1231 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 62 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999) ("Cienega IV”) (dismissing claims for breach of contract for lack of jurisdiction because Cienega Gardens, et al. were not in privity of contract with the United States with regard to the prepayment option); Cienega Gardens v. United States, No. 02-505, 331 F.3d 1319 (Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Basroon
See United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 802 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight v. United States
See Cienega Gardens v. United States, 194 F.3d 1231, 1239 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, Sherman Park Apts. v. United States, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 62 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999); Martinez, 48 Fed.Cl. at 860 ; Wrona v. United States, 40 Fed.Cl. 784, 786 (1998); Malone, 34 Fed.Cl. at 260 ; Etchey v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 152, 154 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Lamonte Duncan v. Willis Morton, Administrator Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, John J. Farmer, Jr. Edward L. Duncan
See United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 810 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999); see also Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776, 784 , 107 S.Ct. 3114 , 97 L.Ed.2d 638 (1987) (“[A]s we noted in Cuyler, the provision of separate murder trials for the three coindictees ‘significantly reduced the potential for a divergence in their interests.’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duncan v. Morton
See United States v. Mor elli, 169 F.3d 798, 810 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 (1999); see also Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776, 784 (1987) ("[A]s we noted in Cuyler, the provision of separate murder trials for the three coindictees `significantly r educed the potential for a divergence in their interests.' ").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pedroni
See, e.g., United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erlikh
See, e.g., United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Karamanos
See, e.g., United States v. Morelli 169 F.3d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enright
See, e.g., United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 , 145 L.Ed.2d 54 (1999) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Austin O. Omoruyi, A/K/A Charles Oloro A/K/A Bobby Pierce Austin O. Omoruyi
Accordingly, section 1956(a)(1) sets forth the four elements of a money laundering offense: (1) an actual or attempted financial transaction; (2) involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity; (3) knowledge that the transaction involves the proceeds of some unlawful activity; and (4) either an intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity or knowledge that the transactions were designed in *295 whole or in part to conceal the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity. 4 See id.; see also United States v. Morelli, 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Omoruyi
In fact, the principles applicable to the validity of the conviction are essentially legal in character. 5 unlawful activity.4 See id. ; see also United States v. Morelli, 169 F.3d 798, 803 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 820 , 120 S.Ct. 63 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-1959.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.