Lake v. Bank One, N. A, 537 U.S. 948 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Lake v. Bank One, N. A, 537 U.S. 948 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Caucus v. Alabama (almd, 2013-08-02) · Strongest negative: Ex Parte Smith (texapp, 2005-01-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Ex Parte Smith
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Ex parte Watkins, 73 S.W.3d 264 , 274 — 75 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 413 , 154 L.Ed.2d 292 (2002) (pretrial habeas corpus available to address collateral estoppel claim based on double jeopardy even though resolution in favor of applicant would not result in dismissal of charges).
discussed Cited "see" Caucus v. Alabama
M.D. Ala. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeJulio v. Georgia, 290 F.3d 1291 , 1295 (11th Cir.) (holding that, with respect to Georgia’s Local Delegations, Hadley’s requirement that officials be “elected” is “clearly satisfied” because, “[w]hen public officials become members of [the delegations] simply by virtue of their popular election to the legislature, they are deemed popularly elected [to the delegations] for the purposes of the one person, one vote requirement”) (punctuation and citation omitted), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 413 , 154 L.Ed.2d 293 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of Spokane
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jake’s, Ltd. v. City of Coates, 284 F.3d 884, 889 (8th Cir.) (holding that application of an amortization provision is constitutional as long as it complies with Renton), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 413 , 154 L.Ed.2d 292 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." J.G. ex rel. Jimenez v. Baldwin Park Unified School District
C.D. Cal. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Dist., 318 F.Supp.2d 851, 859 (N.D.Cal.2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 2Ojai, 4 F.3d at 1472 (finding such a procedure proper when the court “had before it all of the[ ] evidence regarding the issues in. dispute[.]”); see also, Beth B. v. Van Clay, 282 F.3d 493 , 496 n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 412 , 154 L.Ed.2d 292 (2002) (noting that summary judgment is appropriate in IDEA cases “even when the facts are in dispute, and is based on a preponderance of the evidence.”); O’Toole v. Olathe Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lake
v.
Bank One, N. A
02-199.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
537 U.S. 948
Published

537 U.S. 948

LAKE ET AL.
v.
BANK ONE, N. A.

No. 02-199.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 15, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 34 Fed. Appx. 964.