Santana-Mendoza v. United States, 537 U.S. 964 (2002). · Go Syfert
Santana-Mendoza v. United States, 537 U.S. 964 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nowling v. State (indctapp, 2011-10-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nowling v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., U.S. v. Stokes, 292 F.3d 964, 967 (9th Cir.2002) (noting that the United States Supreme Court in *860 Knights overruled Ooley and other cases holding that "searches of probationers [as being] invalid on the ground that they were subterfuges for criminal investigations”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 964 , 123 S.Ct. 398 , 154 L.Ed.2d 321 (2002). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Santana-Mendoza
v.
United States
02-6231.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
537 U.S. 964
Published

537 U.S. 964

SANTANA-MENDOZA
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-6231.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 15, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 29 Fed. Appx. 613.