green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Meade
apprendi merely clarified and extended the scope of a pre-existing right the right to have all convictions supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dominguez v. State
See King v. State, 790 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), review granted, 816 So.2d 127 (Fla.), and review dismissed as improvidently granted, 820 So.2d 941 (Fla.), and cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 394 , 154 L.Ed.2d 314 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Meade
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.) (“Apprendi merely clarified and extended the scope of a pre-existing right — the right to have all convictions supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 961 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Palmer v. Clarke
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1218 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002); Ashley v. United States, 266 F.3d 671, 673 (7th Cir.2001); United States v. Lopez, 248 F.3d 427, 431 (5th Cir.2001); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 , 146 n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 534 U.S. 1032 , 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001) (all holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(C), which requires a retroactivity determination to be made by the Supreme Court itself, does not apply to initial petitions). 35 Accord, United States *1053 v. Moss, 252 F.3d 998, …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ashon Leftenant
See United States v. Bennafield, 287 F.3d 320, 323-24 (4th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002) (holding that defendant could only be convicted of single act of possession for simultaneous possession of multiple packages of cocaine); United States v. Dunford, 148 F.3d 385, 389-90 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that defendant could only be convicted of single act of possession where multiple firearms were seized at single time and location).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spears v. Mullin
(2×)
See United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213, 1219 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d-315 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Cole, 293 F.3d 153, 163 (4th Cir.) (giving standard of review), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 950 , 123 S.Ct. 387 , 154 L.Ed.2d 296 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Riggans
See, e.g., United States v. Bennafield, 287 F.3d 320, 325 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 961 , 123 S.Ct. 388 , 154 L.Ed.2d 315 (2002); United States v. Butler, 74 F.3d 916 , 918 n. 1 (9th Cir.1996); Leverett v. Spears, 877 F.2d 921, 924 (11th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Knight
v.
York, Superintendent, Albemarle Correctional Institution
v.
York, Superintendent, Albemarle Correctional Institution
02-6098.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)
KNIGHT
v.
YORK, SUPERINTENDENT, ALBEMARLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION.
No. 02-6098.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 15, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 32 Fed. Appx. 118.