green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2009–2014 ·
…he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spivery-Jones v. Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc.
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Bowen
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited "see"
(PS) Schwettmann III v. Starns
See Apao v. Bank of New York, 324 F.3d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. 11 denied, 540 U.S. 948 (2003) (§ 1983 “shields citizens from unlawful government actions, but 12 does not affect conduct by private entities.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PS) Selck v. Leibrock
See Apao v. Bank of 1 New York, 324 F.3d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 (2003). 2 Here, plaintiff is suing attorneys in private practice, not a government agency or official. 3 Criminal defense lawyers are not subject to liability under § 1983 for their handling of criminal 4 cases, whether they are privately retained or publicly funded.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PS) Selck v. Leibrock
See Apao v. Bank of 3 || New York, 324 F.3d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 (2003) (§ 1983 “shields 4 || citizens from unlawful government actions, but does not affect conduct by private entities.”). 5 Here, plaintiff is suing a private law firm and/or attorneys in private practice, not a 6 || government agency or official.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beaton v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
See Apao v. Bank of New York, 324 F.3d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 (2003) (§ 1983 8 “shields citizens from unlawful government actions, but does not affect conduct by private entities.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
(PS) Beaton v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
See Apao v. 1 Bank of New York, 324 F.3d 1091, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 (2003) (§ 1983 2 “shields citizens from unlawful government actions, but does not affect conduct by private 3 entities.”). 4 Here, the only defendant is not a state actor and is not alleged to have acted under color of 5 state law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicastro v. McIntyre MacHinery America, Ltd.
See, e.g., Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N the Water Publ'g, 327 F.3d 472, 479-80 (6th Cir.) (expressing "preference” for Justice O’Connor’s approach and applying it to case), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003); Lesnick v. Hollingsworth & Vose Co., 35 F.3d 939, 944-46 (4th Cir.1994) (taking approach similar to that of Justice O’Connor), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1151 , 115 S.Ct. 1103 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1995); Boit v. Gar-Tec Prods., Inc., 967 F.2d 671, 681-83 (1st Cir. 1992) (same); Madara v. Hall, 916 F.2d 1510, 1519 (11th Cir. 1990) (same); Sorrells v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Copeland Corp. v. Choice Fabricators, Inc.
See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and cita *787 tions omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holley-Adkins v. Holley
See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Floret, L. L. C.
v.
Sendecky
v.
Sendecky
03-209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 2003.
540 U.S. 948
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (3)
FLORET, L. L. C., ET AL.
v.
SENDECKY ET AL.
No. 03-209.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 14, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 315 F. 3d 904.