4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 130 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Watson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Watson Anchor | green | “it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached in the absence of the error.” | 74 |
| 2 | People v. Watson | green | “reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached in the absence of the error.” | 29 |
| 3 | People v. Watson | green | “a 'miscarriage of justice' should be declared only when the court, 'after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence,' is of the 'opinion' that it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached in the absence of…” | 19 |
| 4 | People v. Jones | green | “for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang, with the specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal conduct by gang members . . . .” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.