Media Gen. Operations, Inc., Dba Richmond Times-Dispatch v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 543 U.S. 999 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Media Gen. Operations, Inc., Dba Richmond Times-Dispatch v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 543 U.S. 999 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Higgs (mdd, 2016-06-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Higgs
D. Maryland · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281 (4th Cir.2003) ce rt. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 456 (2004).
examined Cited "see" Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See [Noble v. Barnett, 24 F.3d 582, 585 (4th Cir. 1994)] (holding that the claims presented in the applicant’s third habeas petition were barred by the abuse of the writ doctrine because the applicant ‘had full knowledge of the facts central to each of these claims at the time that he filed his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus’ . . . .” [emphasis in original]), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S. Ct. 618 , 160 L.
discussed Cited "see" Mathis v. Thaler (2×)
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Williams, 364 F.3d 235, 239 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 618 , 160 L.Ed.2d 457 (2004) (construing the term “previously” in §§ 2244(b)(2)(A) and 2244(b)(2)(B)(i), and holding that “constitutional rules that were established at the time of the applicant’s last [pre-filing authorization] motion were not ‘previously unavailable’ ”); Bennett v. United States, 119 F.3d 470, 472 (7th Cir.1997) (“You cannot file a successive habeas corpus or section 2255 case on the basis of a claim that is not newly available.”).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wilkerson Estelan
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Clay, 355 F.3d 1281, 1284 (11th Cir.) (explaining that “constructive” possession is sufficient to prove the possession prong under § 841(a), and that constructive possession in drug cases is established “by showing ownership or dominion and control over the drugs or over the premises on which the drugs are concealed” (quotation omitted)), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 626 , 160 L.Ed.2d 456 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. City of Thomasville (2×)
M.D.N.C. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Charleston County 365 F.3d 341 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 606 , 160 L.Ed.2d 457 (2004) (satisfying the three Gingles preconditions is not enough; a plaintiff must show that under the totality of the circumstances the electoral scheme violates Section 2). *500 Even assuming, the three Gingles preconditions have been met, a comprehensive examination of the totality of the circumstances does not indicate that the City’s proposed at-large election scheme would be violative of Section 2.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Collins (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 290-93, 311-12 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 456 (2004); State v. Williams, 992 So.2d 330, 332-34 (Fla.App.2008); People v. Brown, 13 App.Div.3d 145, 146, 786 N.Y.S.2d 55 (2004), appeal denied, 4 N.Y.3d 828 , 829 N.E.2d 676 , 796 N.Y.S.2d 583 (2005); State v. Stokes, 381 S.C. 390, 404-406 , 673 S.E.2d 434 (2009); cf. State v. Lemons, 348 N.C. 335, 351-53 , 501 S.E.2d 309 (1998) (although defendant admitted prior possession of weapon, evidence of prior crime admissible to prove identity), vacated on othe…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Taylor
D.N.M. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 298 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 456 (2004); United States v. Buckland, 289 F.3d 558, 568 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc); United States v. Mills, 446 F.Supp.2d 1115, 1127-1129 (C.D.Cal.,2005). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Timothy W. Omer, United States of America v. Timothy W. Omer
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 304-07 (4th Cir.2003) (relying on later Supreme Court precedents), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 999 , 125 S.Ct. 627 , 160 L.Ed.2d 456 (2004); United States v. Prentiss, 256 F.3d 971, 981-85 (10th Cir.2001) (en banc) (per curiam) (opinion by Baldock, J.) (rejecting applicability of cases, such as Stirone , that predated Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23-24 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)); see also 4 Wayne R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Media General Operations, Inc., Dba Richmond Times-Dispatch
v.
National Labor Relations Board
04-154.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2004.
543 U.S. 999
Published

543 U.S. 999

MEDIA GENERAL OPERATIONS, INC., DBA RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 04-154.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 29, 2004.

1

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 434.