green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Abrams v. General Insurance Co., Inc.
See Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So.2d 774, 778 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Owner's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ott
See Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1973). [2] § 837.02, Fla. Stat. (1979); see § 837.012, Fla. Stat. (1979). [3] But where a communication is reasonably susceptible of two meanings, one of which is libelous and one of which is not, it is for the jury to decide whether those who read the language in fact understood it as libelous.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hallmark Builders, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. Gaylord Broadcasting Company, a Delaware Corporation
See also Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So.2d 774 (Fla.App.), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 32 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOUTHERN AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Etc., Petitioner,
v.
Bertha M. MAXWELL et al., Respondents.
v.
Bertha M. MAXWELL et al., Respondents.
43757.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 30, 1973.
Roberts.
Published
Certiorari dismissed. 274 So.2d 579.
ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.