Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat. Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
217 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 39 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (ca5, 1995-02-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Wilson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
5th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
The judgment is reversed. 349 U.S. at 901, 75 S.Ct. at 576.
cited Cited "see" Mejia Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
11th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. London, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
2d Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moosa v. INS, 171 F.3d 994 , 1000 n. 4 (5th Cir.1999) (citing Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955)); see also Marino v. INS, 537 F.2d 686, 691 (2d Cir.1976) (holding that, at that time, “an alien is not deemed to have been ‘convicted’ of a crime under the [INA] until ... direct appellate review of the conviction ... has been exhausted or waived.”) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Montenegro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
C.D. Ill. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237, 244 (1st Cir.1954), rev’d on other grounds 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (stating that “judicial action in the normal routine appellate review provided by law, [is] part of the ordinary processes of re-examination, the outcome of which perhaps ought to be awaited before it can be said, with sufficient certainty and definiteness, that the state has ‘convicted’ the alien of crime”); Will v. I.N.S., 447 F.2d 529, 533 (7th Cir.1971) (holding that “as long as a direct appeal is pending, it is sufficient to negate finality of convic…
discussed Cited "see" Geilher Molina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. London, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (holding that the federal immigration law word “conviction” requires “finality” despite state law precedent suggesting the contrary); see also Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978 , 110 S.Ct. 505 , 107 L.Ed.2d 507 (1989) (definition of the word “conviction” primarily a matter of federal law); Chong v. INS, 890 F.2d 284, 285 (11th Cir.1989) (same); Kolios v. INS, 532 F.2d 786, 789 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 884 , 97 S.Ct. 234 , 50 L.Ed.2d 165 (1976); Aguilera-Enriquez v…
discussed Cited "see" Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See 355 U. S., at 392 , citing Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672 (1954), and Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U. S. 44 (1955); see n. 16, supra. The instant case does not raise a Commerce Clause issue because the parties agree that the gas is not in interstate commerce and because Congress, by §602, authorized the State to regulate its price.
cited Cited "see" Paolo Zinnanti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Giuseppe Marino v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (per curiam), rev’g, Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir. 1954).
discussed Cited "see" Samuel Murillo Gutierrez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles
9th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 , 47 S.Ct. 582 , 71 L.Ed. 1009 .” (Emphasis added.) Under the second specification of ■error, petitioner places his reliance on Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) which per ■curiam reverses Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir., 1954).
cited Cited "see" Juan Quilodran-Brau v. J. W. Holland, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
3rd Cir. · 1956 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pino v. Nicolls, 1 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 237, 245 , reversed on other grounds, Pino v. Landon, 1955, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1273 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Abreu v. Holder
2d Cir. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Marino v. INS, 537 F.2d 686, 691 (2d Cir.1976) (“[A]n alien is not deemed to have been ‘convicted’ of a crime under the [INA]” until “direct appellate review of the conviction (as contrasted with collateral attack) has been exhausted or waived.”) (relying on Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955)).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp. (3×)
Tenn. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44, 44-45 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 866 (1955) (holding that Oklahoma law was pre-empted); Phillips, 347 U.S. at 684 , 74 S.Ct. 794 (considering whether “states may regulate” certain natural gas sales under the NGA); Ill.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955); In re Ozkok, 191 & N Dec. 546, 551-52, 1988 WL 235459 (BIA 1988); In re L-R-, 8 I & N Dec. 269, 270 , 1959 WL 11561 (BIA 1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Almeida v. Lucey (2×)
D. Mass. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955); Will v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 447 F.2d 529 (7 Cir. 1971); State v. DeBery, 150 Me. 28 , 103 A.2d 523 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO.
v.
PANOMA CORPORATION Et Al.
NO. 191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 11, 1955.
349 U.S. 44
Douglas F. Smith argued the cause for appellant in Nos. 191 and 321. Clarence H. Boss argued the cause for appellant in No. 321. With them on the brief were D. H. Culton, Coleman Hayes, Warren T. Spies and Arthur R. Seder, Jr., Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and T. Murray Robinson argued the cause for appellees in No. 191. Hugh B. Cox argued the cause for appellees in No. 321. With them on a joint brief were Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner, R. M. Williams and Kenneth Heady. Mr. Robinson and Leon Shipp also filed a brief for appellees in No. 191.
Douglas, Harlan.
Cited by 94 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

In these cases Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, that[*45] such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The Phillips case, therefore, controls this one.

We disagree with the contention of the appellees that Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co., 340 U. S. 179, and Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma, 340 U. S. 190, are applicable here. In those cases we were dealing with constitutional questions and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.

Reversed.

Dissent

Mr. Justice Douglas,

being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, is imposed, dissents.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.