Bond v. United States Attorney Gen.'s Off., 537 U.S. 1136 (2003).

Bond v. United States Attorney Gen.'s Off., 537 U.S. 1136 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 4.4 score

6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: United States v. Jones (ca4, 2003-09-12)

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jones (2×)

4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Ceballos, 302 F.3d 679, 690-92 (7th Cir.2002) (panel opinion overruling Lawuary’s footnote statement that § 851(a)’s requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived, because that statement was based on circuit precedent unsupported by reasoning), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1136 , 1137, 123 S.Ct. 924 , 925, 154 L.Ed.2d 829 , 830 (2003), and — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1571 , 155 L.Ed.2d 318 (2003); United States v. Mooring, 287 F.3d 725, 727 (8th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 851(a)’s requirements are not jurisdictional); Prou v. United States, 199 F.3d 37, 43-46 (1st Cir…

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Barnett

4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Ceballos, 302 F.3d 679, 686-87 (7th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 924 , 154 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Rivera-Rosario, 300 F.3d 1, 17 (1st Cir.2002); United States v. Garcia, 291 F.3d 127, 139 (2nd Cir.2002); United States v. Hermanek, 289 F.3d 1076, 1096 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1336 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 2003 WL 183256 (2003); United States v. Watson, 260 F.3d 301, 307 (3d Cir.2001); United States v. Gastiaburo, 16 F.3d 582, 589 (4th Cir.1994).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gray

N.D. Ohio · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

Because Malcolm had authority to approve interception applications under Section 2516(1), he “is presumed to have properly exercised that power and the condition[s] precedent [are] presumed to have been met unless the defendants offer evidence, apart from mere conjecture or speculation, to rebut this presumption.” See United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1416 (8th Cir.1988) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988); see also United States v. Ceballos, 302 F.3d 679, 685 (7th Cir.2002) (holding that defendant failed to …