State v. Carpenter, 286 S.E.2d 384 (S.C. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Carpenter, 286 S.E.2d 384 (S.C. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2003 · 2 courts · …disclosure of information between the parties before trial is designed to avoid surprise and to promote decisions on the merits after a full and fair hearing. at p. 388 ⚠ not in text
53 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Fields Ex Rel. Fields v. Regional Medical Center Orangeburg
S.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
disclosure of information between the parties before trial is designed to avoid surprise and to promote decisions on the merits after a full and fair hearing.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Jumper v. Hawkins
S.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
disclosure of information between the parties before trial is designed to avoid surprise and to promote decisions on the merits after a full and fair hearing.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Saucedo Ex Rel. Sinaloa v. Salvation Army
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is well-settled that causative violation of an applicable statute constitutes actionable negligence and is evidence of recklessness, willfulness and wantoness .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Minnie Davis-Leaf v. Wanda Davis
S.C. Ct. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Code Ann. § 47-7-110 (2017) ("It shall be unlawful for the owner or manager of any domestic animal of any description wilfully or negligently to permit any such animal to run at large beyond the limits of his own land or the lands leased, occupied or controlled by him."); Reed v. Clark, 277 S.C. 310, 313-14 , 286 S.E.2d, 384, 387 (1982) ("[T]his statute does not impose an absolute duty to prevent the escape of livestock from one's custody and control.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Shabazz v. Rodriguez
S.C. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
See Nelson v. Boeing Co., 446 F.3d 1118, 1119 (10th Cir. 2006) ("The general rule in civil cases is that the ineffective assistance of counsel is not a basis for appeal or retrial."); State v. Carpenter, 277 S.C. 309, 310 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982) (providing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must be asserted under the Post-Conviction Relief Act); S.C.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Johnson ex rel. Estate of Valenzuela v. Sam English Grading, Inc.
S.C. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
Whaley v. CSX Transp., Inc., 362 S.C. 456, 483 , 609 S.E.2d 286, 300 (2005); Reed v. Clark, 277 S.C. 310, 314 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 387 (1982); Pittman v. Galloway, 281 S.C. 70, 75 , 313 S.E.2d 632, 635 (Ct.App.1984).
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Kornahrens
S.C. · 1986 · confidence medium
State v. Carpenter, 277 S. C. 309, 286 S. E. (2d) 384 (1982).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Morgan v. Carolina Door Products, Inc. (3×)
S.C. · 1984 · confidence medium
“Disclosure of information between the parties before trial is designed to avoid surprise and to promote decisions on the merits after a full and fair hearing.” Reed v. Clark, 277 S. C. 310, 316, 286 S. E. (2d) 384, 388 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Joan Fancy v. Howard Fancy (2×)
S.C. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Carpenter, 277 S.C. 309, 310 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982) (providing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must be asserted under the Post-Conviction Relief Act); S.C.
examined Cited "see" In the Matter of Jeffrey Allen Chapman (4×)
S.C. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Carpenter, 277 S.C. 309, 309-10 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" Green v. State (2×)
S.C. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Carpenter, 277 S.C. 309, 309 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Bradley v. State (2×)
S.C. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Carpenter, 277 S.C. 309, 309-10 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982) ("Appellant's sole ground for appeal is ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.
discussed Cited "see" Murray v. Koffskey (2×)
S.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Carpenter , 277 S.C. 309, 309-10 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 384 (1982) (finding claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must be asserted under the Post-Conviction Relief Act).
cited Cited "see" McGaha v. Mosley
S.C. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Hodge v. Myers, 255 S. C. 542, 180 S. E. (2d) 203 (1971); see Reed v. Clark, 277 S. C. 310, 286 S. E. (2d) 384 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" McGaha v. Mosley
S.C. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Hodge v. Myers , 255 S.C. 542 , 180 S.E. (2d) 203 (1971); see Reed v. Clark , 277 S.C. 310 , 286 S.E. (2d) 384 (1982). *277 To encourage compliance with discovery procedures, trial courts can impose sanctions upon parties who violate the rules, including exclusion of witnesses whose identities have been withheld.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Smalls
S.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Swindler v. Peay, 227 S.C. 157, 161 , 87 S.E.2d 296, 299 (1955) (finding in a case in which a driver collided with livestock it was not error to suggest the predecessor of section 47-7-110 stated a duty on the part of the owner of the escaped stock); see also Reed v. Clark, 277 S.C. 310, 314 , 286 S.E.2d 384, 387 (1982); McCullough v. Gatch, 251 S.C. 171, 175 , 161 S.E.2d 182, 183-84 (1968) (both applying a negligence standard under the predecessor of section 47-7-130 in cases where a car collided with stock in the highway).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Felder
S.C. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Carpenter, 277 S. C. 309, 286 S. E. (2d) 384 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The STATE, Respondent,
v.
John Odell CARPENTER, Appellant
21631.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 19, 1982.
286 S.E.2d 384
Asst. Appellate Defender Tara D. Shurling, of S. C. Commission of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant., Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Atty. Gen. Lindy P. Funkhouser and Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Brian P. Gibbes, Columbia, and Asst. Sol. Holman C. Gossett, Jr., Spartan-burg, for respondent.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking, grand larceny and illegal possession of a handgun. He was sentenced to six (6) years for housebreaking and grand larceny and one (1) year (suspended) for illegal possession of a handgun.

Appellant’s sole ground for appeal is ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. This Court usually will not consider that issue on appeal from a conviction. State v. Hyman, .... S. C. . . . , 281 S. E. (2d) 209 (1981). We follow that principle particularly when, as here, the issue was not argued to the trial judge. State v. Williams, 266 S. C. 325, 223 S. E. (2d) 38 (1976).

[*310] Under the facts of this case, appellant must assert his claim under the Post-Conviction Procedure Act (Code of Laws [1976] Section 17-27-10 et seq.)

The conviction is therefore affirmed.