green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc.
In other words, under this abuse of discretion standard, “conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and factual findings are reviewed for clear error.” Jordan v. Paccar, Inc., No. 95-3478, 1996 WL 528950, at *5 (6th Cir. Sept.17, 1996) (unpublished); accord United States v. Pauley, 321 F.3d 578, 581 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 201 , 157 L.Ed.2d 140 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rendall
v.
Sedita
v.
Sedita
03-99.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
RENDALL
v.
SEDITA ET AL.
No. 03-99.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 62 Fed. Appx. 396.