Risdal v. Halford, 541 U.S. 1077 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Risdal v. Halford, 541 U.S. 1077 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
Conn. · 2020 · signal: accord · confidence high
Ed. 2d 39 (2006); accord Rules of Professional Con- duct, preamble. ‘‘[A] hearing such as this is not the trial of a criminal or civil action or suit, but an investigation by the court into the conduct of one of its own officers, and that, therefore, while the complaint should be sufficiently informing to advise the . . . attorney of the charges made against [her], it is not required that it be marked by the same precision of statement, or conformity to the recognized formalities or technicalities of pleadings, as are expected in complaints in civil or criminal actions.’’ (Internal quo…
discussed Cited "see" Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
Conn. · 2020 · signal: accord · confidence high
Ed. 2d 39 (2006); accord Rules of Professional Con- duct, preamble. ‘‘[A] hearing such as this is not the trial of a criminal or civil action or suit, but an investigation by the court into the conduct of one of its own officers, and that, therefore, while the complaint should be sufficiently informing to advise the . . . attorney of the charges made against [her], it is not required that it be marked by the same precision of statement, or conformity to the recognized formalities or technicalities of pleadings, as are expected in complaints in civil or criminal actions.’’ (Internal quo…
discussed Cited "see" D'Attilo v. Statewide Grievance Comm.
Conn. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
These materials shall constitute the panel's record in the case." Practice Book § 2-34A(b)(1) provides in relevant part: "When, after a determination of no probable cause by a grievance panel, a complaint is forwarded to the statewide grievance committee because it contains an allegation that the respondent committed a crime, and the statewide grievance committee or a reviewing committee determines that a hearing shall be held concerning the complaint pursuant to Section 2-35(c), the disciplinary counsel shall present the matter to such committee." We note that, although the trial court addre…
discussed Cited "see" Disciplinary Counsel v. Sporn
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
After considering the factors set forth in the American Bar Association's Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (ABA factors); see Burton v. Mottolese , 267 Conn. 1 , 55-56, 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004) ; the court on September 18, 2015, suspended the respondent from the practice of law for two years.
cited Cited "see" Disciplinary Counsel v. Parnoff
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 55 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
examined Cited "see" Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton (3×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Monroe, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. CV 00-0370545 (November 2, 2001) (disbarring same defendant on grounds that she had violated several Rules of Professional Conduct by, inter alia, engaging in unauthorized legal representation of several individuals and making misrepresentations to court), writ dismissed, Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited Cited "see" Massey v. Town of Branford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-50 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited Cited "see" Gambardella v. Apple Health Care, Inc.
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 40 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited Cited "see" New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. Maturo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 44 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158, L.
cited Cited "see" Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed Cited "see" Tarro v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 40 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (noting that fact finder “is best able to judge the credibility of the witnesses and to draw necessary inferences therefrom” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited Cited "see" Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-52 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bunker
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed Cited "see" Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004). [1] When the committee presents an attorney for misconduct, the court is authorized by Practice Book § 2-47 to "render a judgment dismissing the complaint or imposing discipline as follows: reprimand, suspension for a period of time, disbarment or such other discipline as the court deems appropriate." Because the court in Mottolese already had taken into consideration each and every act of misconduct alleged in the presentment at hand in its disbarment of the defe…
cited Cited "see" Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-52 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cohen v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rev. 3 , 28 (2002) (‘‘[r]ule 3.3 (a) often overlaps with [r]ule 8.4 (c),’’ and ‘‘lawyer [who] violates [r]ule 3.3 (a) generally violates [r]ule 8.4 (c)’’); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 51–52, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (holding that trial court reasonably concluded that plaintiff violated rule 3.3 (a) (1) and that same conduct supported conclusion that plaintiff violated rule 8.4 (3)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McCullough v. Rocky Hill
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See General Statutes § 1-24a (requiring affiant to ‘‘swear to the truth of the document or writing before any proper officer’’); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 46 n.47, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (noting that ‘‘the document filed by the plaintiff was not, in actuality, an affidavit because the contents were not sworn to and did not satisfy the requirements of a proper affidavit’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Starboard Resources, Inc. v. Henry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. , supra, 668 F.3d at 75 ; see also Burton v. Mottolese , 267 Conn. 1 , 49, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) ( "adverse rulings do not amount to evidence of bias"), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Perez
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
We traditionally have recognized that the right to appellate review of an order imposing sanctions is part and parcel of those due process rights accorded to a disciplined attorney.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Briggs v. McWeeny, 260 Conn. 296, 312 , 796 A.2d 516 (2002); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 19 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (“[b]ecause a license to practice law is a vested property interest and disciplinary proceedings are adversary proceedings of a quasi-criminal nature, an attorney subject to discipline is entitled to due process of law” [intern…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Risdal
v.
Halford
03-9671.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
541 U.S. 1077
Published

541 U.S. 1077

RISDAL
v.
HALFORD ET AL.

No. 03-9671.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 1, 2004.

1

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.