aggravating and mitigating factors (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

aggravating and mitigating factors in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Olsen v. Stategreen
wyo · 2003 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003Stat. Ann. § 6-2-102 (Lexis Nexis 2003); which, although it contains no express weighing provision, has been interpreted by the court to require balancing of the aggravating and mitigating factors, to require that “the burden of negating [the] mitigating evidence by proof beyond a reasonable doubt remains with the State.” Olsen v. State, 67 P.3d 536, 590 (Wyo. 2003).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Webb green
conn · 1996
2 sentences

2004“In [State v. Webb], supra, 238 Conn. 389 , we explained that comparative proportionality review can be performed in one of two ways: the frequency method, pursuant to which a reviewing court uses a complicated method of statistical analysis that purports to quantify, with something like mathematical precision, the various factors leading to the imposition, or nonimposition, of the death penalty, and the frequency with which the death penalty is imposed in certain circumstances; id., 511; and the precedent seeking approach, pursuant to which a reviewing court compares the case before it to oth

2003In Webb I, supra, 238 Conn. 389 , we explained that comparative proportionality review can be performed in one of two ways: the frequency method, pursuant to which a reviewing court “uses a complicated method of statistical analysis that purports to quantify, with something like mathematical precision, the various factors leading to the imposition, or nonimposition, of the death penalty, and the frequency with which the death penalty is imposed in certain circumstances”; id., 511; and the precedent seeking approach, pursuant to which a reviewing court “compares the case before it to other case

22003–2004
Runningen v. Kentucky green
scotus · 2004
1 sentence

2025Pattis argues that ‘‘[t]he dismissed grievance does not fall within the aggravating factors recommended by the ABA and approved by our Supreme Court in Burton [v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.

12025–2025
Risdal v. Halford green
scotus · 2004
1 sentence

2025Pattis argues that ‘‘[t]he dismissed grievance does not fall within the aggravating factors recommended by the ABA and approved by our Supreme Court in Burton [v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.

12025–2025
Sanyo North America Corp. v. Harris Corp green
scotus · 2004
1 sentence

2025Pattis argues that ‘‘[t]he dismissed grievance does not fall within the aggravating factors recommended by the ABA and approved by our Supreme Court in Burton [v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.

12025–2025
Burton v. Mottolese green
conn · 2003
2 sentences

2025Pattis argues that ‘‘[t]he dismissed grievance does not fall within the aggravating factors recommended by the ABA and approved by our Supreme Court in Burton [v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.

2025Pattis argues that ‘‘[t]he dismissed grievance does not fall within the aggravating factors recommended by the ABA and approved by our Supreme Court in Burton [v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.

12025–2025
State v. Rizzo green
conn · 2003
2 sentences

2004Additionally, we conclude that, pursuant to our decision in State v. Rizzo, 266 Conn. 171, 242 , 833 A.2d 363 (2003), the trial court did not instruct the jury properly under § 53a-46a (e) and (f) with respect to the process of weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors. 6 Accordingly, we reverse the judg ment of the trial court insofar as it imposes the death penalty and remand the case for a new penalty phase hearing.

2004Additionally, we conclude that, pursuant to our decision in State v. Rizzo, 266 Conn. 171, 242 , 833 A.2d 363 (2003), the trial court did not instruct the jury properly under § 53a-46a (e) and (f) with respect to the process of weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors. 6 Accordingly, we reverse the judg ment of the trial court insofar as it imposes the death penalty and remand the case for a new penalty phase hearing.

12004–2004
State v. Ramseur green
nj · 1987
2 sentences

2003Id., 521; cf. State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123, 321 , 524 A.2d 188 (1987) (improper for prosecutor to argue that death penalty was appropriate to protect society from “cruel, horrible, inhumane acts of murder”).

2003Id., 521; cf. State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123, 321 , 524 A.2d 188 (1987) (improper for prosecutor to argue that death penalty was appropriate to protect society from “cruel, horrible, inhumane acts of murder”).

12003–2003
Blystone v. Pennsylvania green
scotus · 1990
1 sentence

1994Indeed, in this case, the trial court underscored this deficiency in the statutory scheme by limiting counsel in their summations from explaining to the jurors the consequences of their decision on the aggravating and mitigating factors. 36 The majority holds that our statutory scheme meets eighth amendment requirements in reliance on Blystone v. Pennsylvania, supra, 494 U.S. 299 .

11994–1994
Caldwell v. Mississippi green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

1994The United States Supreme Court has held “that it is constitutionally impermissible to rest a death sentence on a determination made by a sentencer who has been led to believe that the responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death rests elsewhere.” Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320, 328-29 , 105 S. Ct. 2633 , 86 L.

1994The United States Supreme Court has held “that it is constitutionally impermissible to rest a death sentence on a determination made by a sentencer who has been led to believe that the responsibility for determining the appropriateness of the defendant’s death rests elsewhere.” Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320, 328-29 , 105 S. Ct. 2633 , 86 L.

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-45 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-46a (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-46b (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54b (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-35a (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-82f (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NJ 700 (1980–2026) OH 274 (1990–2026) IL 137 (1981–2026) CA 120 (1976–2026) FL 89 (1979–2025) LA 86 (1984–2019) IN 84 (1980–2026) NY 81 (1988–2026) AZ 48 (1978–2026) NC 46 (1981–2026) WA 45 (1984–2026) TN 26 (1993–2018) KS 19 (1993–2021) ME 18 (1994–2026) AK 18 (1982–2025) MD 15 (1983–2024) CO 13 (1990–2012) UT 12 (1994–2020) MS 11 (1993–2023) AL 10 (1994–2016) PA 10 (1998–2024) GA 9 (2014–2025) NV 9 (1990–2019) DE 7 (1985–2023) CT 6 (1994–2025) IA 6 (2010–2023) OR 6 (1992–2022) OK 5 (1994–2017) AR 4 (2009–2025) NH 4 (2010–2015) MT 3 (1993–1996) MN 3 (2007–2014) MI 3 (2000–2009) NE 3 (1993–2023) WY 2 (2003–2017) TX 2 (1996–2020) WI 2 (2020–2026) VT 2 (2019–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check