discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Robinson Thus, the Court concluded that “evidence of both of defendant’s previous felony convictions was admissible at trial as proof of an element of the crime charged and the manner in which the present offense was | ^committed, proof of either prior conviction being sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for the present offense.” Id., 357 So.2d at 494 ; See also, State v. Washington, 00-1542 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/14/01) , 782 So.2d 689 , writ denied, 01-0940 (La.2/8/02), 807 So.2d 859 .