green
Positive treatment
Issue: newly-recognized constitutional right exceptionPA ↗
Issue: PCRA time barPA ↗
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Cochran, K.
See Commonwealth v. Cochran, 953 A.2d 596 (Pa.Super. 2008), appeal denied, 598 Pa. 786 , 959 A.2d 927 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Berger, C.
See 42 Pa. C.S. § 9545(b). “[E]xceptions to the time bar must be pled in the PCRA petition, and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” Commonwealth v. Burton, 936 A.2d 521, 525 (Pa. Super. 2007), appeal denied, 959 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lomax
See Commonwealth v. Burton, 936 A.2d 521, 524 (Pa.Super.2007) (stating PCRA timeliness requirements are jurisdictional in nature and court cannot hear untimely PCRA petitions), appeal denied, 598 Pa. 786 , 959 A.2d 927 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Thomas, M.
See Commonwealth v. Smith, 85 A.3d 530, 537 (Pa. Super. 2014) (holding smell of marijuana constituted sufficient reasonable suspicion to justify a seizure); see also Commonwealth v. Bailey, 947 A.2d 808, 815 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 959 A.2d 927 (Pa. 2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
BURTON.
v.
BURTON.
686 EAL (2007).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 8, 2008.
959 A.2d 927
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.