Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Com. v. Harris, J.
(2×)
The - 11 - J-A14003-25 legislature chose to amend the Juvenile Act due to “[t]he dramatic increase in violent crimes committed by juveniles in our society[.]” Commonwealth v. Cotto, 708 A.2d 806, 809 (Pa. Super. 1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Beltran
Instead, the presumption "merely determines which court will try the case and evaluate the elements of the offense." (Emphasis added.) L.J.S., 539 N.W.2d at 413 ; see also State v. Coleman, 26 P.3d 613, 618 (Kan. 2001) ("The presumption does not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant on any elements of the offenses"); Commonwealth v. Cotto, 708 A.2d 806, 814 (Pa. Super.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Beltran
Instead, the presumption “merely determines which court will try the case and evaluate the elements of the offense.” (Emphasis added.) L.J.S., 539 N.W2d at 413; see also State v. Coleman, 271 Kan. 733, 738 , 26 P.3d 613, 618 (2001) (“The presumption does not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant on any elements of the offenses”); Commonwealth v. Cotto, 708 A.2d 806, 814 (Pa. Super. 1998) (because transfer hearing determines only “the appropriate forum for the adjudicatory proceeding,” burden on minor “does not violate the maxim that the Commonwealth is charged wit…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Coleman
App. 192 , 497 S.E.2d 696 (1998); Com. v. Cotto, 708 A.2d 806, 813 (Pa. Super. 1998); In re Boot, 130 Wash. 2d 553, 570-71 , 925 P.2d 964 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rivera
See Commonwealth v. Cotto, 708 A.2d 806, 811 (Pa.Super.1998) (noting that change in language of statute generally indicates change in legislature’s intent) (citation omitted); St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOUSE OF LLOYD, INC., Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE, Appellee
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE, Appellee
Direct Appeal 66 M.D. Appeal Docket 1997.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 3, 1998.
Per Curiam.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this third day of April, 1998, the order of the Commonwealth Court dated May 22,1997, is hereby affirmed.