State v. Peay, 970 A.2d 729 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Peay, 970 A.2d 729 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Brody v. Brody (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Peay, 111 Conn. App. 427, 429 , 959 A.2d 655 (2008), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 915 , 970 A.2d 729 (2009). 4 Brody submits, and we agree, that the writ of error is the proper vehicle for her to secure appellate review, as she is not a party to the underlying case.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kitchens
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Velez, 113 Conn. App. 347, 357-59 , 966 A.2d 743 (failure to take exception to trial court’s response to jury question about proof of intent constituted waiver under Fabricatore), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 917 , 970 A.2d 729 (2009); State v. Akande, 111 Conn. App. 596, 608-609 , 960 A.2d 1045 (2008) (“We decline to draw a distinction between defense counsel stating that he had no problem with a jury charge that he specifically requested and defense counsel stating that he had no problem with a jury charge that he had not specifically requested.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Chimenti
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Velez, 113 Conn. App. 347 , 361 n.8, 966 A.2d 743 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 917 , 970 A.2d 729 (2009). 19 We note that the right against double jeopardy may be waived by silence or by the actions of counsel and need not be knowing, intelligent and voluntary or expressly made.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ebron
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
There is also no difference between counsel stating that he has no comment about the charge and counsel stating that the charge as read was correct.” State v. Akande, supra, 608-609 ; see also State v. Velez, 113 Conn. App. 347, 357-59 , 966 A.2d 743 (failure to except to trial court’s response to jury question about proof of intent constituted waiver under Fabricatore), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 917 , 970 A.2d 729 (2009); State v. Farmer, 108 Conn. App. 82, 88 , 946 A.2d 1262 (failure to file request to charge or except to constancy of accusation instruction constituted waiver under Fabrica…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Paige
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction, 291 Conn. 62, 73 , 967 A.2d 41 (2009) (noting that unpreserved, waived claims fail under third prong of Golding and declining to afford review under Golding to petitioner who waived claim); see also State v. Velez, 113 Conn. App. 347, 359 , 966 A.2d 743 (defendant’s waived claim of improper jury instruction fails under third prong of Golding), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 917 , 970 A.2d 729 (2009); State v. Duncan, supra, 96 Conn. App. 560 (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Abdul N. Peay
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 6, 2009.
970 A.2d 729
Abdul N. Peay, pro se, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
McLACHLAN.
Published

The petition by the plaintiff in error Abdul N. Peay for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 427 (AC 29052), is denied.

McLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.