green
Positive treatment
Issue: warrant requirementGA ↗
Issue: automobile exceptionGA ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
26.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Susan Lowe v. State
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath and affirmation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael Perry v. Daryll Peterson
See Lewis v. Waller, 282 Ga. App. 8, 9-10 (1) (a) ( 637 SE2d 505 ) (2006) (holding that plaintiff was entitled to default judgment where there was no dispute that defendant was served and had not answered, even though plaintiff filed proof of service five months after service and with the motion for default judgment);5 McPherson v. McPherson, 238 Ga. 271, 273 (4) ( 232 SE2d 552 ) (1977) (rejecting the argument that the trial court’s improper dismissal could nonetheless be affirmed based on plaintiff’s failure to make a return of service as required by the statute because it also provided t…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In THE INTEREST OF C. B., CHILDREN (FATHER)
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
(Citations and emphasis omitted.) Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579, 581 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Wehman Newsome, Sr. v. Sonya Graham
Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579, 581 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010) (citation, punctuation, and emphasis omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
STEVEN J. YOUD v. JAMES L. BESKIN
(2×)
The exercise of this 1 Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579, 581 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010) (citations and punctuation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
PARK HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. v. MICHAEL SMITH
Cf. Koby v. Koby, 277 Ga. 160, 160 (2) ( 587 SE2d 48 ) (2003) (affirming the trial court’s denial of ex-wife’s motion to set aside a divorce decree, in which she claimed she had reconciled with her ex-husband, and explaining that “the [trial] court specifically found that there was not a bona fide reconciliation, and there was ample evidence to support that conclusion” (emphasis supplied)); Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579, 584 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010) (“Because some evidence supported the trial court’s finding that personal service occurred, we affirm the trial court’s or…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cascade Parc Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Clark
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The defendant attempting to evade service “cannot seek to benefit from her own refusal to cooperate.” Newsome, 305 Ga. App. at 583 (1).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Winstar Development, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Bank, 263 Ga. 296, 298-299 (2) ( 430 SE2d 732 ) (1993). 6 Ameribank, N.A. v. Quattlebaum, 220 Ga. App. 345, 347 (2) ( 469 SE2d 462 ) (1996). 7 OCGA § 9-11-4 (e) (1). 8 OCGA § 9-11-4 (e) (7). 9 (Citation, punctuation and emphasis omitted.) Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579, 581-582 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth S. Cooper v. Atlantic Management Services, LLC
See, e.g., Newsome v. Johnson, 305 Ga. App. 579 , 582–83 (1) ( 699 SE2d 874 ) (2010) (finding service sufficient where documents left outside of door after process server verified defendant’s identity through the door, but defendant refused to open the door); Tavakolian, 304 Ga. App. at 665 (4) (holding service was proper where person meeting the description of the defendant’s wife declared that she was not the defendant and then closed the garage door and process server dropped complaint and summons on the garage floor); Carter v. Progressive Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Iowa v. Bryan Jeffrey Stone
See, e.g., State v. Sarden, 699 S.E.2d 880, 883 (Ga. App. 2010); State v. Hobbs, 933 N.E.2d 1281, 1286 (Ind. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cosby v. Lewis
IX (d) (emphasis supplied). 12 Teston, 217 Ga. App. at 831 (3). 13 Id. 14 See, e.g., Cooper v. Paulding County School Dist., 265 Ga. App. 844, 845 ( 595 SE2d 671 ) (2004) (holding that school principal, who was sued in his individual capacity, was entitled to official immunity); Hemak v. Houston County School Dist., 220 Ga. App. Í10, 112-13 ( 469 SE2d 679 ) (1996) (same); Teston, 217 Ga. App. at 831 (3) (holding that school employees, who were sued in their individual capacities, were entitled to official immunity in lawsuit arising out of classroom incident). 15 Cf. Bd. of Regents &c. v. Fro…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
E. I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
v.
WATERS Et Al.
v.
WATERS Et Al.
A09A0339.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 13, 2010.
Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, Paul W. Painter, Jr., Sarah B. Akins, for appellant., Osteen & Osteen, Christopher J. Osteen, Stephen A. Sael, Jeffery L. Arnold, Richard H. Middleton, Jr., H. Craig Stafford, Alvin G. Wells, Jr., for appellees.
McMurray, Smith, Phipps.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Georgia (1)
MCMURRAY, Senior Appellate Judge.
In E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Waters, 287 Ga. 235 (695 SE2d 265) (2010), the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed in part and reversed in part our prior decision in this case. See E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Waters, 298 Ga. App. 843 (681 SE2d 651) (2009). Accordingly, our prior judgment is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Judgment reversed and case remanded.
Smith, P. J., and Phipps, P. J., concur.