Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Zimmer v. Town of Lancaster Industrial Development Agency
“It is settled law that where the alleged defect or dangerous condition arises from the contractor’s methods and the owner exercises no supervisory control over the operation, no liability attaches to the owner under the common law or under section 200 of the Labor Law” (Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290, 295 [1992]; see Gielow v Coplon Home, 251 AD2d 970, 972 [1998], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 92 NY2d 1042 [1999], rearg denied 93 NY2d 889 [1999]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zimmer v. Town of Lancaster Industrial Development Agency
“It is settled law that where the alleged defect or dangerous condition arises from the contractor’s methods and the owner exercises no supervisory control over the operation, no liability attaches to the owner under the common law or under section 200 of the Labor Law” (Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290, 295 [1992]; see Gielow v Coplon Home, 251 AD2d 970, 972 [1998], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 92 NY2d 1042 [1999], rearg denied 93 NY2d 889 [1999]).
discussed
Cited "see"
ZIMMER, JAMES v. TOWN OF LANCASTER INDUSTRIAL DEVELO
“It is settled law that where the alleged defect or dangerous condition arises from the contractor’s methods and the owner exercises no supervisory control over the operation, no liability attaches to the owner under the common law or under section 200 of the Labor Law” (Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290, 295 ; see Gielow v Rosa Coplon Home, 251 AD2d 970, 972 , lv dismissed in part and denied in part 92 NY2d 1042 , rearg denied 93 NY2d 889 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Szafranski v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority
Labor Law § 200” (Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876, 877 [1993]; see Gielow v Rosa Coplon Home, 251 AD2d 970, 972-973 [1998], lv dismissed and denied 92 NY2d 1042 [1999], rearg denied 93 NY2d 889 [1999]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Becky J. Gielow, Appellant,
v.
Rosa Coplon Home Et Al., Defendants, and Rosa Coplon Jewish Home & Infirmary Et Al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
v.
Rosa Coplon Home Et Al., Defendants, and Rosa Coplon Jewish Home & Infirmary Et Al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 14, 1999.
708 N.E.2d 172
Published
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for leave to amend her complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.