Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co., 210 P. 1024 (Okla. 1922). · Go Syfert
Search
Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co., 210 P. 1024 (Okla. 1922). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schrimsher
v.
Hardwike Etter Co.
12388.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Dec 12, 1922.
210 P. 1024
Dabnejy & Morrill, for plaintiff in error., A. R. Garrett, for defendant in error.
Nicholson, Harrison, McNeill, Miller, Kennamer, Cochran.
Published
NICHOLSON, J.

This case is presented on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal, the ground of such motion being that the appeal is frivolous, and for delay only.

The action was upon a written instrument and an account duly verified. The answer was an unverified general denial. The-trial court sustained the motion of the plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings. The execution of the written instrument and the correctness of the account not being put in issue by the answer, the action of the trial court in sustaining the motion for judgment on the pleadings was proper.

It is apparent (hat the appeal is frivolous. .Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

HARRISON, C. J., and McNEILL, MILLER, KENNAMER, and COCHRAN, JJ., concur.