7 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1931–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pickle v. Blissgreen1 sentence1997Pickle v. Bliss, 418 P.2d 69, 76 (Okl.Cr.1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2016Const. Art. 2, 6, 2 was violated and order reinstatement of his driving privileges." Pierce, 24. , I 6 The Pierce Court citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), State of Oklahoma ex rel. 2016Const. Art. 2, 6, 2 was violated and order reinstatement of his driving privileges." Pierce, 24. , I 6 The Pierce Court citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), State of Oklahoma ex rel. | 4 | 1977–2016 |
Bauhaus v. State
green
2 sentences1977We have previously discussed Barker and the right to a speedy hearing generally in Bauhaus v. State, Okl.Cr., 532 P.2d 434 (1975). 1977NOTES [1] We have previously discussed Barker and the right to a speedy hearing generally in Bauhaus v. State, Okl.Cr., 532 P.2d 434 (1975). | 2 | 1977–1977 |
State Ex Rel. Burns v. Steely
green
1 sentence1982Barns v. Steely, 600 P.2d 367 (Okl.Cr.1979), which is dispositive of this issue. 2 In his final assignment of error, the appellant alleges that he was prejudicially denied his right to a speedy hearing. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
LDF v. State
green
2 sentences1982In support of his contention, he relies upon L.D.F. v. State, 561 P.2d 114 (Okl.Cr.1977), in which this Court found a 20 month delay between the incident and certification, during which time the defendant turned 18 years of age, to be a denial of his constitutional right to a speedy hearing. 1982In support of his contention, he relies upon L.D.F. v. State, 561 P.2d 114 (Okl.Cr.1977), in which this Court found a 20 month delay between the incident and certification, during which time the defendant turned 18 years of age, to be a denial of his constitutional right to a speedy hearing. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Application of Cameron
green
2 sentences1960There is nothing before us in the way of proof to indicate that the petitioners were substantially damaged by the delay herein, or that the County Attorney is not acting in good faith, nor does it appear that there is any desire on the part of the County Attorney to deny them a speedy hearing on the complaint pending in the Justice of the Peace Court, such as existed in the Application of Cameron, 97 Okl.Cr. 81 , 258 P.2d 208 , in which the County Attorney, evidencing bad faith and vexatious motives, stated that he never intended to bring the case to trial, hence, relief was granted. 1960There is nothing before us in the way of proof to indicate that the petitioners were substantially damaged by the delay herein, or that the County Attorney is not acting in good faith, nor does it appear that there is any desire on the part of the County Attorney to deny them a speedy hearing on the complaint pending in the Justice of the Peace Court, such as existed in the Application of Cameron, 97 Okl.Cr. 81 , 258 P.2d 208 , in which the County Attorney, evidencing bad faith and vexatious motives, stated that he never intended to bring the case to trial, hence, relief was granted. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Schrimsher v. Hardwike Etter Co.
neutral
1 sentence1931It proceeded then to cite the case of Beck Mining Company v. State Industrial Commission, 88 Okla. 34 , 211 Pac. 69 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Beck Mining Co. v. State Industrial Commission
neutral
1 sentence1931It proceeded then to cite the case of Beck Mining Company v. State Industrial Commission, 88 Okla. 34 , 211 Pac. 69 . | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.