G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…a rule applied infrequently, unexpectedly, or freakishly may not constitute an independent and adequate state ground
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · 2 courts ·
…this court has continually held that the law of parties announced in 7.01 and 7.02 is applicable to capital murder cases.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Holguin, Alfredo
this court has continually held that the law of parties announced in 7.01 and 7.02 is applicable to capital murder cases.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Alfredo Holguin v. State
this court has continually held that the law of parties announced in 7.01 and 7.02 is applicable to capital murder cases.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Orlando Rosa v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections
(2×)
a rule applied infrequently, unexpectedly, or freakishly may not constitute an independent and adequate state ground
examined
Cited "see"
Henderson v. State
(3×)
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 533 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 852 , 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Garay v. State
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 533 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 852 , 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993); Narvaiz v. State, 840 S.W.2d 415, 432 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 975 , 113 S.Ct. 1422 , 122 L.Ed.2d 791 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Grady v. Artuz
See Lilly v. Gilmore, 988 F.2d 783, 786 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 852 , 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993); Horne v. Trickey, 895 F.2d 497, 500 (8th Cir.1990); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. State
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 533 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1933); Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Robinson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 216 , 222 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); *585 see also State v. Toone, 872 S.W.2d 750 , 751 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Puga v. State
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 533 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993); Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Robinson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 216 , 222 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2765 , 129 L.Ed.2d 879 (1994); see also State v. Toone, 872 S.W.2d 750 , 751 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norris v. State
(2×)
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 533 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banda v. State
(2×)
See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 537 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993); Harris, 827 S.W.2d at 962 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Leslie Jameson v. Thomas Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner and New York State Department of Correctional Services
See Lilly v. Gilmore, 988 F.2d 783, 786 (7th Cir.) (“The Sixth Amendment does not require [appellate] counsel to forecast changes or advances in the law, or to press meritless arguments before a court.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 *430 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chambers v. State
See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 532-33 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 154 , 126 L.Ed.2d 115 (1993) (evidence sufficient to support second issue based on shooting of two victims in course of burglary because “dead men don’t talk”; one victim shot while on knees pleading for mercy); Turner v. State, 698 S.W.2d 673, 676 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (op. on reh’g) (defendant’s planning of robbery of store where he was previously employed, defendant’s “coolly” carrying out of offense, choking of store clerk with hemp rope, lack of remorse, evidence that…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Croswell
v.
the Lee County Board of Commissioners.
v.
the Lee County Board of Commissioners.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jun 28, 1920.
Messrs. Tatum, Jennings , and Dusenburg , for appellant, cite: Case arose under Act No. 519, 30 Stat., p. 963. What is county officer: 139 Am. St. Rep. 1030; 20 Ann. Cas. 418. Qualifications: Const., art. II, sec. 2. Rural policemen: 27 Stat. 906.
Mr. C.B. Ruffin , for respondent, cites: Rural policeman not a county officer: 27 Stat. 906. And as such not entitled to increase provided for by act at 30 Stat. 963.
Gary.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Gary.For the reasons assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, the appeal is dismissed.