Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gilbert v. Moore
(2×)
In Hyman v. Aiken, this court found an identical malice instruction given in a South Carolina case to be prejudicial.20 Although Hyman involved different circumstances, we noted that the "importance of the malice instructions is emphasized by the solicitor's reliance on them in his closing argument . . . ."21 This is not a dispositive factor, _________________________________________________________________ close range, hitting victim in head); Tucker v. Kemp, 762 F.2d 1496, 1503 (11th Cir. 1985) (victim kidnaped, driven to remote location, and then killed as a result of crushing blow to skull…
cited
Cited "see"
Nicholas Todd Sutton v. State
See Houston v. Dutton, 50 F.3d 381 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 905 , 116 S.Ct. 272 , 133 L.Ed.2d 193 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Dicks v. State
See Houston v. Dutton, 50 F.3d 381, 387 (6th Cir. 19 95), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 272 (1995). 3 our determination that the Middlebrooks error was not harmless.
discussed
Cited "see"
First Union National Bank v. Shealy
See Morgan v. Morgan, 116 S.C. 272 , 108 S.E. 110 (1921) (where grantor after executing deeds conveying land, retained possession of the land and continued to hold the deeds, the deeds were ineffective, there having been no delivery).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard A. Ganey L. Larry Bryant Alpha Properties, Inc. Robertson Management Services, Inc. Thomas McNamara Joyce Randolph Bill Overstreet Rachel Overstreet v. Joseph Raffone Vita L. Raffone J.D. Raffone Associates, Inc., Mortgage Service Associates
See NCR Corp. v. SAC-CO Inc., 43 F.3d 1076, 1081 (6th Cir.) ("A court may only remand a case back to the arbitrator when an arbitration award is ambiguous."), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 272 (1995); Refino v. Feuer Trans., Inc., 480 F.Supp. 562, 565 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (authorizing remand because award was ambiguous), aff'd, 633 F.2d 205 (2d Cir.1980); see also Island Creek Coal Sales, 764 F.2d at 440 ("Indeed, it is true that, as a general principle, a court does not have the power or authority to correct or modify either an incomplete or ambiguous arbitration award.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert E. Lee v. City of Aurora
See Ruyle v. Continental Oil Co., 44 F.3d 837, 841-42 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 272 (1995). 12 The "question of law" plaintiff contends he raised was whether he was a "qualified individual with a disability." Br. of Appellant at 10-14; Appellant's Reply Br. at 5.
cited
Cited "see"
Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.
See Ruyle v. Continental Oil Co., 44 F.3d 837 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 272 , — L.Ed.2d — (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Ruth Fransen v. Conoco, Inc.
See Ruyle v. Continental Oil Co., 44 F.3d 837 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 272 , --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ISCO International, Inc. v. Conductos, Inc.
Hebert v. Lisle Corp., 99 F.3d 1109, 1114 (Fed.Cir.1996); see also Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Spectramed, Inc., 49 F.3d 1575, 1584 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert denied, 516 U.S. 906 , 116 S.Ct. 272 , 133 L.Ed.2d 194 (1995) (noting that “inequitable conduct is a matter for the trial judge, and not the jury,” but recognizing that the underlying factual issues may be determined by a jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. And Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Defendants/cross-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Spectramed, Inc., 49 F.3d 1575, 1582 , 34 USPQ2d 1120, 1125 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 272 , 133 L.Ed.2d 194 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cheryl R. Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc., S & N Enterprises, Inc., Richard Sloss
Ms. Zimmerman now contends the state agency’s decision precludes defendants from arguing she was not discharged. “[W]hen a state agency ‘acting in a judicial capacity resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate,’ federal courts must give the agency’s factfinding the same preclusive effect to which it would be entitled in the State’s courts.” University of Tenn. v. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788, 799 , 106 S.Ct. 3220, 3226 , 92 L.Ed.2d 635 (1986) (quoting United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394, 422 , 8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Durham v. Blackard
See, e.g., Morgan v. Morgan, 116 S.C. 272 , 108 S.E. 110 (1921) (where grantor, after executing deeds conveying the land, retained possession of the land and continued to exercise the rights of proprietorship over it, and continued to hold deeds, the deeds were ineffective; there having been no delivery).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morgan
v.
Morgan Et Al.
v.
Morgan Et Al.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jun 30, 1921.
Mr. R.E. Wylie , for appellants, cites: What amounts to delivery of a deed or raises a presumption of delivery: 19 S.C. 211 ; 9 Rich. Eq. 203; Rice Eq. 243; 83 S.C. 330; 4 McC. 100; 52 S.C. 472 ; 10 Rich. Eq. 220; 90 Am. St. Rep. 164; 61 Am. St. Rep. 176; 96 Am. Rep. 312; 53 Am. St. Rep. 535; 115 S.C. 240; 55 Am. Rep. 399; 50 Am. St. Rep. 189; 82 Am. St. Rep.; 109 Am. St. Rep. 311; 61 Am. St. Rep. 132. No intention to deliver shown in 82 S C. 264; 44 S.C. 364 . Answer of grantor in another proceeding .
Mr. Harry Hines , for respondent, cites: No intention to deliver deeds: 82 S.C. 265; 44 S.C. 364 ; 23 S.C. 89 . No estoppel in pais: 111 S.C. 57; 82 S.C. 266; 79 S.C. 421; 70 S.C. 206; 96 S.C. 122; 67 S.C. 452; 84 S.C. 430; 104 S.C. 165; 97 S.C. 129. What is delivery of deed:
5 A. E. Enc. L. (1st Ed.) 445.
Watts.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.For the reasons assigned by his Honor, Judge McIver, it is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.