Treatment trajectory · 1938 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1938
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Raul Zavala Robledo v. State
App. 1961); Williams v. State , 102 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex. Crim.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Allen v. State
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Allen relies upon several cases, including Bowden v. State, 361 S.W.2d 207, 208 (Tex.Crim.App.1962); Williams v. State, 102 S.W.2d 212, 214 (Tex.Crim.App.1937); Powell v. State, 170 Tex.Crim. 415 , 341 S.W.2d 915, 916 (1961); and Davis v. State, 150 Tex.Crim. 124 , 199 S.W.2d 155, 156 (1946).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Galvan v. State
(2×)
Bowden v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.App. 578 , 361 S.W.2d 207, 208 (1962); Powell v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.App. 415 , 341 S.W.2d 915, 916 (1961); Williams v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. 36 , 102 S.W.2d 212, 213 (1937).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lee Andrew Navarro v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 213-214 (emphasis added); see also Davis v. State , 199 S.W.2d 155, 158 (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Spradling v. State
(2×)
In other words, in cases of collision of cars, it appears plain that the parties must not fail to stop, but must do so, and also render to the person struck, or the occupants of the car collided with, all such help and assistance as the facts and circumstances would dictate to a person of ordinary temperament, disposition, and feeling under like circumstances.” Id., 102 S.W.2d, at 212.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCown v. State
(2×)
Like many other jurisdictions, Texas has tacitly applied this objective standard of reasonableness regarding a driver’s knowledge of injury to another person. 1 See Scott v. State, 90 Tex.Crim. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097, 1100 (1921) (holding fair and reasonable construction of the statute in question required driver to render all aid that would reasonably appear to him as ordinary person to be necessary); see also Williams v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. 33 , 102 S.W.2d 212, 213 (1937) (holding that in automobile collision cases, parties must stop and render aid to person struck, offering all such help an…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Michael McCown A/K/A David M. McCown v. State
Like many other jurisdictions, Texas has tacitly applied this objective standard of reasonableness regarding a driver’s knowledge of injury to another person. (footnote: 1) See Scott v. State , 90 Tex. Crim. 100 , 233 S.W. 1097, 1100 (1921) (holding fair and reasonable construction of the statute in question required driver to render all aid that would reasonably appear to him as ordinary person to be necessary); see also Williams v. State, 132 Tex. Crim. 33 , 102 S.W.2d 212, 213 (1937) (holding that in automobile collision cases, parties must stop and render aid to person struck, offering a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank Williams
v.
State
v.
State
No. 18794.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb 17, 1937.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
Hawkins.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
HAWKINS, Judge.
— Conviction is for burglary, punishment being assessed at eight years in the penitentiary.
The indictment is in proper form. No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward.
We note that in pronouncing sentence against appellant the court inadvertently omitted to give the indeterminate, sem tence law effect. (Art. 775, C. C. P.). The sentence will be[*37] reformed directing that appellant be incarcerated in the State penitentiary for not less than two nor more than eight years.
As thus reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.