Vanita UU. v. Mahender VV., 41 N.E.3d 78 (NY 2015). · Go Syfert
Vanita UU. v. Mahender VV., 41 N.E.3d 78 (NY 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Melissa N. v. Jeffrey B.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Upon such review, and accepting Family Court's credibility determinations ( Matter of Chigusa Hosono D. v Jason George D. , 137 AD3d 631, 632 [1st Dept 2016]), we find that petitioner established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent committed acts constituting the family offenses of harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct during a visit with their son in a public place (Penal Law §§ 240.26; 240.20[2] and [3]; see Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV. , 130 AD3d 1161, 1166 [3d Dept 2015], lv dismissed and denied 26 NY3d 998 [2015]; Matter of Banks v Opoku , 109…
discussed Cited "see" Paul LL. v. Tanya LL.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
This inquiry “involves the examination of several factors, including the relative fitness, stability, past performance, and home environment of the parents, as well as their ability to guide and nurture the child [ren] and foster a relationship with the other parent” (Matter of Rockhill v Kunzman, 141 AD3d 783, 784 [2016] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV., 130 AD3d 1161, 1163 [2015], lv dismissed and denied 26 NY3d 998 [2015]).
discussed Cited "see" Paul LL. v. Tanya LL.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
This inquiry “involves the examination of several factors, including the relative fitness, stability, past performance, and home environment of the parents, as well as their ability to guide and nurture the child [ren] and foster a relationship with the other parent” (Matter of Rockhill v Kunzman, 141 AD3d 783, 784 [2016] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV., 130 AD3d 1161, 1163 [2015], lv dismissed and denied 26 NY3d 998 [2015]).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. Patinka
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Family Court may properly order supervised visitation if it finds that unsupervised visitation would be “detrimental to the children’s safety because the parent is either unable or unwilling to discharge his or her parental responsibility properly” (Matter of Raychelle J. v Kendell K., 121 AD3d 1206, 1207-1208 [2014] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV., 130 AD3d 1161, 1165 [2015], lv dismissed and denied 26 NY3d 998 [2015]).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. Patinka
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Family Court may properly order supervised visitation if it finds that unsupervised visitation would be “detrimental to the children’s safety because the parent is either unable or unwilling to discharge his or her parental responsibility properly” (Matter of Raychelle J. v Kendell K., 121 AD3d 1206, 1207-1208 [2014] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Vanita UU. v Mahender VV., 130 AD3d 1161, 1165 [2015], lv dismissed and denied 26 NY3d 998 [2015]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Vanita UU.
v.
Mahender VV., (And Other Related Proceedings.)
Published

[*999] Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the Family Court order dismissing the violation petition, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine a proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.