Reynolds v. Hall, 138 S.E. 670 (Ga. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Reynolds v. Hall, 138 S.E. 670 (Ga. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1927 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1927 1976 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) CARRAGHER v. Potts
Ga. Ct. App. · 2009 · confidence medium
See also Brotherton v. Stone, 197 Ga. 74, 75 (3) ( 28 SE2d 467 ) (1943); Middleton v. Westmoreland, 164 Ga. 324, 329 (1) ( 138 SE 852 ) (1927).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Smith, Bassett, Purcell & Koenig v. Word of God Ministries, Inc.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
It is well established that the attorney’s lien created under OCGA § 15-19-14 (c) “attaches to the fruits of the labor and skill of the attorney, whether realized by judgment or decree, or by virtue of an award, or in any other way, as long as they are the result of his exertions.” (Punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied.) Middleton v. Westmoreland, 164 Ga. 324, 329 (1) ( 138 SE 852 ) (1927).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Woodward v. Lawson
Ga. · 1969 · confidence medium
Co., 101 Ga. 80, 83 ( 23 SE 634 ).” Middleton v. Westmoreland, 164 Ga. 324, 328 ( 138 SE 852 ).
cited Cited "see" Moore v. Diamond Manufacturing Co. (In Re Diamond Manufacturing Co.)
S.D. Ga. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Middleton v. Westmoreland, 164 Ga. 324, 328 , 138 S.E. 852 (1927).
cited Cited "see" Molloy v. Hubbard
Ga. Ct. App. · 1934 · signal: see · confidence high
See Middleton v. Westmoreland, 164 Ga. 324 ; Twiggs v. Chambers, 56 Ga. 279 ; Hargett v. McCadden, 107 Ga. 773 . 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reynolds
v.
Hall
No. 5677.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jun 18, 1927.
138 S.E. 670
Gilbert.
Published
Gilbert, J.

This case is controlled adversely to the plaintiff in error by the decision in the case of Reynolds v. Wingate, ante, 317, dealing with the same timber contract.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.