Dougherty Cnty. Sch. Sys. v. Grossman, 149 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966). · Go Syfert
Dougherty Cnty. Sch. Sys. v. Grossman, 149 S.E.2d 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MERITAGE HOMES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. BILLY JONES
Ga. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
Center of Central Ga., 1 This appeal concerns four lower court cases. 359 Ga. App. 669 , 670 ( 859 SE2d 827 ) (2021) (reversing the trial court judgment and remanding the case “for the parties to effectuate their agreement”); Dougherty County School System v. Grossman, 113 Ga. App. 825, 825 ( 149 SE2d 920 ) (1966) (reversing judgments “for the purpose of effecting a settlement of the cases and ending the litigation,” where both appellant and appellee requested such appellate outcome); Lee v. Barron, 108 Ga. App. 473, 473 ( 133 SE2d 256 ) (1963) (reversing, “for the purpose of facilit…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rouse v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
The dissent relies upon Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827-828 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966), for the proposition that MARTA was not obligated to add this safety feature.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Adams v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
Ga. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co. v. Andrews, 117 Ga. App. 164, 166 ( 159 SE2d 460 ) (1968). 15 Ga. L. 1992, p. 1179, § 1. 16 Id. 17 See Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 828 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966); see also Millar Elevator Svc.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Saltis v. A.B.B. Daimler Benz
Ga. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co., 13 Ga. App. 498, 499 (2) ( 79 SE 364 ) (1913), overruled on other grounds, Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 828-829 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Walker v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
Ga. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
J., dissenting); Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 828-829 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Millar Elevator Service Co. v. O'SHIELDS
Ga. Ct. App. · 1996 · confidence medium
The case he relies on, Piller v. Hanger Cab Co., 115 Ga. App. 260, 263 ( 154 SE2d 420 ) (1967), overlooked this Court’s rejection of this substitute for proof which is explained in Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 828-829 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Holland Furnace Co. v. Willis
Ga. Ct. App. · 1969 · confidence medium
See Quick Shops v. Oldham, 100 Ga. App. 551, 555 ( 111 SE2d 920 ); Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 149 SE2d 861 ); Spruell v. Ga. Automatic Gas &c.
cited Cited as authority (rule) White v. Augusta Motel Hotel Investment Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1969 · confidence medium
Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 149 SE2d 861 ).
discussed Cited "see" Lodge v. Champion Home Builders Co. (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 149 SE2d 861 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ballard v. Southern Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966); Quick Shops v. Oldham, supra. The principle that the occupier is not an insurer is frequently noted.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ellis v. Sears Roebuck & Co. (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See also Darlington Corp. v. Finch, 113 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 149 SE2d 861 ) (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM
v.
GROSSMAN (two cases)
42136, 42140.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jun 13, 1966.
149 S.E.2d 920
Rawls &■ Campbell, H. G. Rawls, C. B. Rogers, for appellants., Burt ■& Burt, for appellee.
Eberhardt.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Eberhardt, Judge.

Judgments adverse to the defendant having been entered, from which appeals were filed in this court, and counsel for both appellant and appellee having filed with the clerk a written request that, for the purpose of effecting a settlement of the cases and ending the litigation, the judgments be reversed, it is ordered that the judgment in each case be and it is hereby

Reversed.

Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.