Grant v. Bell, 276 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Grant v. Bell, 276 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Adams v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1990 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Moore, supra (disclosure of informant’s identity sought orally at trial even though Brady motion filed earlier); State v. Royal, 247 Ga. 309, 312-314 (2) ( 275 SE2d 646 ) (1981) (defendant’s Brady motion sought disclosure of informant’s identity); Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457, 459-460 (3) ( 274 SE2d 807 ) (1980) (motion to suppress and Brady motion); State v. Martin, 156 Ga. App. 554, 555 ( 275 SE2d 129 ) (1980) (physical precedent in which motion to disclose identity of informer was paired with a Brady motion for exculpatory material); Brinson v. State, 188 Ga. App. 21…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Skipworth v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1988 · confidence medium
Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457, 459 (3) ( 274 SE2d 807 ) (1980); Williams v. State, 178 Ga. App. 581, 585 (3) ( 344 SE2d 247 ) (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Roden v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1986 · confidence medium
Therefore, [Brady and Roviaro] must be read together where, . . . the question is disclosure of the identity of the state’s [informant] . . . ‘“[T]he trial judge must, therefore, conduct a hearing on the merits of the Brady motion and if he finds the evidence material under Brady weigh it against the state’s privilege under Roviaro. . . .’” Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457, 459 (3) ( 274 SE2d 807 ) (1980); Williams v. State, 178 Ga. App. 581, 585 (3) ( 344 SE2d 247 ) (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Anderson v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1983 · confidence medium
See generally Allums v. State, 161 Ga. App. 842, 844 (3) ( 288 SE2d 783 ) (1982); Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457, 458 (1) ( 274 SE2d 807 ) (1980); Tamez v. State, 148 Ga. App. 307 ( 251 SE2d 159 ) (1978); Sheppard v. State, 138 Ga. App. 597 ( 226 SE2d 744 ) (1976); Kenerleber v. State, 137 Ga. App. 618 ( 224 SE2d 476 ) (1976).
cited Cited "see" Gilbert v. Colonial Stores Division
Ga. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Vigorelli, Inc. v. Smith, Phillips & Dipietro, 157 Ga. App. 52 ( 276 SE2d 158 ) (1981); Morris v. Hodge, 152 Ga. App. 815, 817 ( 264 SE2d 482 ) (1979).
cited Cited "see" Davidson v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457 ( 274 SE2d 807 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oliver v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Davidson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 457 (2) ( 274 SE2d 807 ) (1980); McAllister v. State, 157 Ga. App. 158 (1) ( 276 SE2d 669 ) (1981); Shrader v. State, 159 Ga. App. 522 (1) ( 284 SE2d 37 ) (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GRANT
v.
BELL
57379.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 14, 1980.
276 S.E.2d 158
Tom B. Benham, for appellant., Robert H. Herndon, James E. Peugh, Thomas C. James, III, for appellees.
Quillian.
Published
Quillian, Presiding Judge.

On certiorari, Grant v. Bell, 246 Ga. 371 (271 SE2d 467), the Supreme Court has reversed our judgment in Grant v. Bell, 153 Ga. App. 832 (266 SE2d 512). Therefore, in conformity with the mandate of that court our judgment is vacated and the Supreme Court’s judgment reversing the trial court is made the judgment of this Court. -

Judgment reversed.

Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.