Cuba Vill. v. Town of New Hudson, 42 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973). · Go Syfert
Cuba Vill. v. Town of New Hudson, 42 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
102 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Opn. No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1992 · confidence medium
Cf., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 (1916); Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Opn. No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1990 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an "office" is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Orday, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1989 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an office is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Formal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1989 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an office is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1989 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an `office' is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1986 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an `office' is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1986 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an `office' is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1985 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an `office' is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1985 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an `office' is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Informal Opinion No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1983 · confidence medium
The statutory designation of a position as an "office" is some indication that the legislative body intended to treat its occupant as a public officer (cf. Matter of MacDonald v Ordway, 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 [1916]; Matter of Haller v Carlson, supra, p 830).
cited Cited "see" Greene v. McGuire
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Haller v. Carlson, 42 A.D.2d 829 , 346 N.Y.S.2d 108 (4th Dep’t 1973); Fishbein v. State, 282 A.D. 600 , 125 N.Y.S.2d 845 (3d Dep’t 1953).
discussed Cited "see" Bowman v. Squillace
N.Y. App. Div. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
In passing, I note that an inspector has been held to be a public officer (Public Officers Law, § 2; see Matter of Haller v Carlson, 42 AD2d 829 ), but a public officer is not necessarily a town officer.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Opn. No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Hoefle v. Cahill , 188 N.Y. 489 , 494 (1907); see also Haller v. Carlson , 42 A.D.2d 829 (4th Dep't 1973) .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ryan
E.D.N.Y · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
O’Day v. Yeager, 308 N.Y. 580, 586 , 127 N.E.2d 585 (N.Y.1955) (citations and quotation marks omitted); see also Haller v. Carlson, 42 A.D.2d 829 , 346 N.Y.S.2d 108 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Opn. No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Op Atty Gen (Inf) No. 95-40; see also , Matter of Haller v. Carlson , 42 A.D.2d 829 (4th Dept 1973).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Opn. No.
N.Y. Att'y Gen. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
Gen. 454; see, also, Haller v. Carlson, 42 A.D.2d 829 [1973], to the effect that a town building inspector in the Town of Ellicott is a public officer).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cuba Village
v.
Town of New Hudson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jul 6, 1973.
42 A.D.2d 829
Published

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: On May 11, 1971 the plaintiff Cuba Village Fire Department responded to a citizen’s report of a fire in the Hanging Bog area of the defendant Town of New Hudson. En route, one of the fire pumper’s engines was damaged while climbing a very steep grade. The plaintiff thereafter brought an action for $1,750 property damages against the Town of New Hudson. The defendant moved for summary judgment alleging improper service upon it of a notice of claim under section 209 of the General Municipal Law. In affirming Special Term’s denial of the motion we observe that the statute requires that written notice of claims for loss or damage “be served by mail or otherwise on * * * the town clerk of the town” within 60 days of such loss or damage (General Municipal Law, § 209, subd. 2). In this case a written notice of claim was mailed to a member of the Town Board of the Town of New Hudson and thereafter presented by that member to the Town Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Inasmuch as this concededly occurred within the 60-day time limitation, we conclude that it constitutes adequate and timely service upon the Town Clerk under the statute (General Municipal Law, § 209, subd. 2), since the Town Clerk is required by law to attend all board meetings (Town Law, § 30, subd. 1). (Appeal from order of Allegany Special Term denying motion for summary judgment.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.