Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Vega
Therefore the trial court should have conducted an in camera inquiry in accordance with the guidelines set forth in People v Darden (supra; see also, People v Patti, 59 AD2d 949 ), and we remit the matter for such a hearing and report.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jose Perez
v.
Jose Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 28, 1977.
Published
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 27, 1977, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first and second degrees, upon a jury verdict,[*950] and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We find that no reversible error was committed (see CPL 470.05, subd 1; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.