In re Ruthie R., 99 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Ruthie R., 99 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Byrne v. State
N.Y. App. Div. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
However, as the State’s Court of Appeals has recently reiterated, failure to timely serve the officer designated by statute to receive service of a claim constitutes a fatal defect which is not susceptible to the ameliorative doctrine of substantial compliance (Parochial Bus Systems v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539, 547-548 ; see Davidson v Bronx Municipal Hosp., 99 AD2d 730, 732 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Ruthie R., City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 23, 1984.
99 A.D.2d 730
Published

Appeal from an order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gertrud Mainzer, J.), entered on November 6, 1982, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Carro, J. P., Bloom, Fein, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.