People v. Kevorkian, 104 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Kevorkian, 104 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rojan Mgt., Inc v. Melville Massage & Acupuncture, PLLC
N.Y. Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty. · 2026 · confidence medium
None of the allegations of conversion or unjust enrichment assert claims that are separate and distinct from the alleged breach of contract ( see Ebury Fund 1, LP v Arque Tax Receivable Fund, LP, 175 AD3d 1486 , 1487 [2d Dept 2019]; Jagarnauth v Massey Knakal Realty Services, Inc., 104 AD3d 564, 565 [1st Dept 2013]; East End Laboratories, Inc. v Sawaya, 79 AD3d 1095, 1095 [2d Dept 2010]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Douglas Kevorkian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 21, 2013.
104 A.D.3d 564
Published

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about May 4, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Sweeny, J.E, Acosta, Román, Feinman and Clark, JJ.