green
Positive treatment
Issue: personal privilegeNY ↗
Issue: heavy presumptionNY ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“mobile food vendors authorized to sell in city parks by the department of parks and recreation are not exempt from the prohibition on multiple permit ownership set forth in local law no. 15 .....”
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rossi v. City of New York
mobile food vendors authorized to sell in city parks by the department of parks and recreation are not exempt from the prohibition on multiple permit ownership set forth in local law no. 15 .....
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Big Apple Ice Cream, Inc. v. City of New York
“The issue of whether the legislation is the most efficacious means of achieving the desired goal is not for the court to consider” (Big Apple Food Vendors’ Assn., 228 AD2d at 282-283 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United Car & Limousine Foundation Inc. v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission
A court cannot base its review on whether the rule is the most effective way to effectuate the goal of the agency (Big Apple Food Vendors’ Assn. v City of New York, 228 AD2d 282, 282-283 [1st Dept 1996]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gangemi v. City of New York
Assn. of Am. v Harnett, 44 NY2d 302 , 312 [1978]; see also Big Apple Food Vendors’ Assn. v City of New York, 228 AD2d 282 , 282-283 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 807 [1997]; Huggins v City of New York, 126 Misc 2d 908, 910-911 [1984]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Richard Kranis, a Disbarred Attorney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 13, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.