People v. Addison, 259 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Addison, 259 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ortega v. Puccia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
By contrast, when the manner of work is at issue, “no liability will attach to the owner solely because [he or she] may have had notice of the allegedly unsafe manner in which work was performed” (Dennis v City of New York, 304 AD2d 611, 612 [2003]; see Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d at 877 ; Ferrero v Best Modular Homes, Inc., 33 AD3d at 851 ; Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417, 419 [1999]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McCoy v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
Co., Inc., 28 AD3d 225 [2006], affd 7 NY3d 805 [2006] [presence of on-site safety manager not grounds for imposing liability]; Singh v Black Diamonds LLC, 24 AD3d 138 [2005] [project superintendent’s conduct of regular walk-throughs, authority to stop work for unsafe conditions and inspection of plywood covering hole through which plaintiff fell insufficient to impose liability under Labor Law § 200]; see also Dennis v City of New York, 304 AD2d 611, 612 [2003]; Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417, 419 [1999]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ferrero v. Best Modular Homes, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · confidence medium
Co., 302 AD2d 328 [2003]; Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417, 419 [1999]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dennis v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2003 · confidence medium
Moreover, no liability will attach to the owner solely because it may have had notice of the allegedly unsafe manner in which work was performed (see Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876 [1993]; Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417, 419 [1999]).
discussed Cited "see" McParland v. Travelers Insurance
N.Y. App. Div. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
We reject plaintiff’s contention that supervisory control is not necessary to make a general contractor liable under section 200, and that actual or constructive notice of the injury-causing condition is enough (cf. Comes 82 NY2d at 878 ; see Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417, 419 [1999]).
discussed Cited "see" Cundy v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
In his attempt to move from the center of the ring gear to the outside, plaintiff “was exposed to the usual and ordinary dangers of a construction site, and not the extraordinary risks envisioned by Labor Law § 240 (1)” (Rodriguez v Tietz Ctr. for Nursing Care, 84 NY2d 841 ; see, Colon v Lehrer, McGovern & Bovis, 259 AD2d 417 ; Farmer v City of Niagara Falls, 249 AD2d 922 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Appleyard v. First Prestige Props., Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Defendants met their burden of showing that plaintiff was not a Bronx County resident when she commenced this action ( see CPLR 503[a]) by submitting her driver's license issued in 2017, a disability application from 2018, and an accident claim report from 2019, all showing that plaintiff lived in Milton, New York ( see Book v Horizon Asset Mgt. , 105 AD3d 661 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Furlow v Braeubrun , 259 AD2d 417 [1st Dept 1999]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Appleyard v. First Prestige Props., Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Defendants met their burden of showing that plaintiff was not a Bronx County resident when she commenced this action ( see CPLR 503[a]) by submitting her driver's license issued in 2017, a disability application from 2018, and an accident claim report from 2019, all showing that plaintiff lived in Milton, New York ( see Book v Horizon Asset Mgt. , 105 AD3d 661 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Furlow v Braeubrun , 259 AD2d 417 [1st Dept 1999]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Steven Addison
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 25, 1999.
259 A.D.2d 417
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered September 25, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of the evidence, including the interplay between defendant and the codefendant and defendant’s actions in handing a bag to the codefendant, along with the conversation between the undercover officer and the codefendant, provided ample evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer defendant’s participation in a drug selling enterprise. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.