People v. Pagan, 270 A.D.2d 5 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Pagan, 270 A.D.2d 5 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2011 · …would alter the substantive nature of claim ⚠ not in text
23 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Singleton v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · confidence medium
Auth., 25 AD3d 450, 451 [1st Dept 2006]; Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [1st Dept 2000]; Walker v New York City Tr.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Singleton v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · confidence medium
Auth., 25 AD3d 450, 451 [1st Dept 2006]; Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [1st Dept 2000]; Walker v New York City Tr.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Castillo v. Kings County Hospital Center
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
Auth., 126 AD3d at 775 ; Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [2000]; Johnson v County of Suffolk, 238 AD2d 480 [1997]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Morris v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
In any event, the new evidence did not include the notices of claim served in connection with the related personal injury actions to establish that the City had timely, actual knowledge of the petitioner’s claim of negligence by the City and her resulting injuries (see Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 5-6 [2000]; Matter of Mangona v Village of Greenwich, 252 AD2d 732, 733 [1998]; Rudd v Andrews, 199 AD2d 772, 773 [1993]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nacipucha v. City of New York
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2008 · confidence medium
“To adopt plaintiffs position that such circumstances gave defendant timely actual notice of the facts constituting his claim would be to substitute police reports for notices of claim in every instance, mandate that defendant investigate every possible cause of action that might be suggested in an accident report, disregard the prejudice caused by the lost opportunity to conduct a prompt investigation” (Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [1st Dept 2000]; see also Walker v New York City Tr.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Perez v. Empire Bus Co.
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2006 · confidence medium
“To adopt plaintiffs position that such circumstances gave defendant timely actual notice of the facts constituting his claim would be to substitute police reports for notices of claim in every instance, mandate that defendant investigate every possible cause of action that might be suggested in an accident report, [and] disregard the prejudice caused by the lost opportunity to conduct a prompt investigation” (Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [1st Dept 2000]; see also Matthews v New York City Hous.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Wollins v. New York City Board of Education
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
Accordingly, the municipal defendant did not have timely actual notice of the facts constituting the claim by virtue of such a report (see Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5, 6 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see" Aegis v. Port Authority
2d Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Olivera v. City of New York, 270 A.D.2d 5 , 5–6 (1st 15 Dep’t 2000) (concluding that notice of claim for property damage did not give sufficient notice 16 that motorist was also filing suit for personal injuries and refusing to permit amendment where 17 alteration “would alter the substantive nature of claim”). 18 Con Edison argues that its failure to give sixty days prior notice of its claims of negligent 19 design and construction of the building caused no conceivable harm to Port Authority, in that it 20 pleaded the new theories within three months of its June 2002 Notice.
discussed Cited "see" Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2d Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Olivera v. City of New York, 270 A.D.2d 5, 5-6 , 704 N.Y.S.2d 42 (1st Dep’t 2000) (concluding that notice of claim for property damage did not give sufficient notice that motorist was also filing suit for personal injuries and refusing to permit amendment where alteration “would alter the substantive nature of claim”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dominguez v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Auth., 220 AD2d 413 ; Matter of Dube v City of New York, supra; Caselli v City of New York, 105 AD2d 251, 255-258 ; see also, Olivera v City of New York, 270 AD2d 5 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Luis Pagan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Mar 2, 2000.
270 A.D.2d 5
Published

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered on or about January 21, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.