green
Positive treatment
Issue: litigation claimNY ↗
Issue: witnesses after an evidentiary hearingNY ↗
Issue: quality assurance privilegeNY ↗
6.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Newman v. Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., Inc.
Mount Sinai failed to sustain its burden of establishing that it is entitled to invoke the quality assurance privilege for all the documents plaintiff seeks, as the only documents covered by that privilege are those generated in connection with a quality assurance review function under Education Law § 6527(3) ( see Siegel v Snyder , 202 AD3d 125, 137 [2d Dept 2021]; Kivlehan v Waltner , 36 AD3d 597, 599 [2d Dept 2007]; Little v Highland Hosp., 280 AD2d 908, 909 [4th Dept 2001]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Aldridge v. Brodman
Defendants and Kaleida had the burden of establishing that the privileges are applicable (see Little v Highland Hosp. of Rochester, 280 AD2d 908, 909 [2001]; Maisch v Millard Fillmore Hosps., 262 AD2d 1017, 1017-1018 [1999]), and they failed to meet that burden.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Marzett L., Monroe County Attorney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 7, 2001.
Published
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see, Matter of Alex N., 255 AD2d 626, 627). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Miller, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.