People v. Schultz, 283 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Schultz, 283 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Newton v. Burge
W.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., People v. Scott, 283 A.D.2d 525 , 727 N.Y.S.2d 442 (2d Dept.2001) (“The decision not to request an alibi charge was reasonable in view of the weakness of the defendant’s alleged alibi, which consisted solely of his own testimony that he was alone at-home at the time of the crime.”); People v. Coleman, 283 A.D.2d 321 , 724 N.Y.S.2d 856 (1st Dept.2001) (“Counsel’s failure to request an alibi charge or to emphasize the alibi issue in summation can be readily explained by the weakness of the alibi testimony.”); People v. Frye, 210 A.D.2d 503 , 620 N.Y.S.2d 993 (1st Dept.1994…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Charles Schultz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 14, 2001.
283 A.D.2d 525
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

—Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated May 28, 1999, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence obtained from his vehicle.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People’s notice of appeal was timely because there was no evidence as to the date on which the defendant, who was the prevailing party, served the order (see, CPL 460.10 [1] [a]; People v Washington, 86 NY2d 853).

The determination of the County Court, which had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, must be accorded great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if it is supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). Here, the People failed to prove that the defendant voluntarily consented to the search of his truck (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.