State v. Veney, 868 N.E.2d 679 (Ohio 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Veney, 868 N.E.2d 679 (Ohio 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thompkins, 07ap-74 (8-23-2007)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thompkins , Franklin App. No. 06AP-310, 2006-Ohio-6148 , discretionary appeal not allowed, 114 Ohio St.3d 1425 , 2007-Ohio-2904 , 868 N.E.2d 679 . {¶ 4} Meanwhile, on November 2, 2006, appellant filed in the trial court a timely petition for postconviction relief.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Veney
2007-0657.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jun 20, 2007.
868 N.E.2d 679
Accept, Appeal, Lanzinger, Law, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295. Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-0656, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-Ohio-1295.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. Pfeifer, J., dissents.