Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 172 F.3d 767 (11th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 172 F.3d 767 (11th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Deauville Hotel Property, LLC (flsd, 2021-01-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) The Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Deauville Hotel Property, LLC
S.D. Fla. · 2021 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir. 1999) (quoting Key v. Allstate Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Mt. Hawley Insurance Co. v. Miami River Port Terminal, LLC
S.D. Fla. · 2017 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir. 1999), so the Court begins its analysis with the language of the Policy.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vozzcom v. Great American Ins. Co. of New York (2×)
S.D. Fla. · 2009 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir.1999) (citing Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Vozzcom, Inc. v. BEAZLEY INS. CO., INC.
S.D. Fla. · 2009 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir.1999) (citing Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Ins.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Karen Anderson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
11th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir.1999).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson (10×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. · 2000 · confidence medium
We have for review a question of Florida law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Anderson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 172 F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir.1999), which is determinative of a cause pending in that court and for which there appears to be no controlling precedent.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reynolds v. Roberts
11th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir.1999) (applying Florida law), or, in the case of a contract of adhesion, resolving the ambiguity in favor of the adhering party, cf. Wheelock v. Sport Kites, Inc., 839 F.Supp. 730 , 736 n. 6 (D.Haw.1993) (applying Hawaii law), or in favor of a party without sophisticated legal assistance, cf. Edwin K.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reynolds v. Butts
11th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 769 (11th Cir. 1999) (applying Florida law), or, in the case of a contract of adhesion, resolving the ambiguity in favor of the adhering party, cf. Wheelock v. Sport Kites, Inc., 839 F. Supp. 730 , 736 n.6 (D.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
11th Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir. 1999).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
11th Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
Co., 172 F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Mosquito Control District of Florida v. Coregis Insurance
11th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 172 F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir.1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
97-3270.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 13, 1999.
172 F.3d 767
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
Karen ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-3270.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

July 3, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 96-00247-CIV-OC-10A); Wm. Terrell Hodges, Judge.

Before BIRCH and KEITH*, Circuit Judges.**

PER CURIAM:

On April 13, 1999, we issued an opinion in this case in which we requested the Florida Supreme

Court's assistance with respect to a certified question concerning whether the tractor-trailer rig involved in this case should be treated as a single-covered automobile, under the insurance policy language forming the basis of the present dispute, or whether the single accident resulting in plaintiff-appellee Anderson's injuries constituted two occurrences within the meaning of the policy. See Anderson v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 172

F.3d 767, 770 (11th Cir.1999). The Florida Supreme Court rephrased the questions as follows:

I. Based on the applicable insurance policy language, should the tractor and trailer each be treated as a single covered automobile?

II. If the tractor and trailer should each be treated as a single covered automobile, does the applicable policy language unambiguously limit coverage to a total of $750,000, even when multiple insured vehicles are involved in a single accident?

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 756 So.2d 29 (Fla.2000). The Florida Supreme Court then answered "the first rephrased certified question in the affirmative," finding "that the tractor and trailer should each be treated

* Honorable Damon J. Keith, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. ** Judge Joseph W. Hatchett resigned on May 14, 1999, and did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). as a single covered automobile." Id. at 33. The Florida Supreme Court answered "the second rephrased certified question in the negative" finding that the policy provided "separate liability coverages for each

insured vehicle that was involved in the accident" and "the total available liability coverage for the accident that involved both vehicles is $1,500,000." Id. at 37.

Because the Florida Supreme Court's holdings are consistent with the rulings of the district court, the district court's grant of summary judgment and award of $1,500,000 to Anderson for her injuries is

AFFIRMED.

[*2]