neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
Issue: corollary ruleNJ ↗
Issue: anti-Lepis clauseNJ ↗
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOSEPH A. SAVARESE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
v.
THERESA M. CORCORAN
v.
THERESA M. CORCORAN
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division.
Apr 14, 1998.
George G. Whitmore, attorney for appellant (Joanne S. Nadell, on the brief)., Edward L. Larsen, attorney for respondent.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
In this post-judgment matrimonial case, defendant Theresa M. Corcoran appeals from that portion of the January 31,1997, order which denied her motion for increased child support and from the order of April 30, 1997, denying her motion for reconsideration. We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Raymond A. Hayser, J.T.C., t/a, in his written opinion of April 30, 1997. Savarese v. Corcoran, 311 N.J.Super. 240, 709 A.2d 829 (Ch.Div 1997).
Affirmed.