In re Carracino, 121 A.3d 862 (N.J. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Carracino, 121 A.3d 862 (N.J. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …an employer may seek disgorgement of a disloyal employee's compensation as a remedy for the breach of the duty of loyalty, with or without a finding of economic loss. at p. 873 ⚠ not in text
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" GOYDOS v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY (2×)
D.N.J. · 2024 · signal: but see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
an employer may seek disgorgement of a disloyal employee's compensation as a remedy for the breach of the duty of loyalty, with or without a finding of economic loss.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC
3rd Cir. · 2025 · confidence medium
See Winback, 42 F.3d at 1439 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 14N, cmt. b); Kaye v. Rosefielde, 121 A.3d 862, 869 (N.J. 2015).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC
3rd Cir. · 2025 · confidence medium
See Winback, 42 F.3d at 1439 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 14N, cmt. b); Kaye v. Rosefielde, 121 A.3d 862, 869 (N.J. 2015).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Toray Plastics (America), Inc. v. Paknis
D.R.I. · 2022 · confidence medium
Appx. 93, 96 (11th Cir. 2012), breach of the duty of loyalty, see Kaye v. Rosefielde, 121 A.3d 862, 870 (N.J. 2015), and breach of fiduciary duty, Serv.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION v. FRANCHITTI
D.N.J. · 2022 · confidence medium
“An agent has a fiduciary duty to act loyally for the principal’s benefit in all matters connected with the agency relationship.” Kaye v. Rosefielde, 121 A.3d 862, 869 (N.J. 2015) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 8.01 (2005)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY CARRACINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 018721982)
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 18, 2015.
121 A.3d 862
Published

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented, it is ORDERED that ANTHONY CARRACINO of WARREN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months effective January 4,1999, by Order of this Court filed December 9, 1998, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.