Osorio v. State, 769 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Osorio v. State, 769 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jaime OSORIO
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 4D99-1249.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 13, 2000.
769 So. 2d 429
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Farmer, Polen, Shahood.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. Any error which may have been occasioned by the court’s failure to include the word “knowingly” when instructing the jury on the elements of appellant’s offense[1] was not presented by a contemporaneous request for such inclusion, nor any objection once the instruction was given. See Lawson v. State, 552 So.2d 257 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

POLEN, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
1

Appellant was convicted 'of committing a lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child, his 12-year old daughter, section 800.04(4), Florida Statutes (1997).