Bowers v. Bowers, 784 A.2d 889 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Bowers v. Bowers, 784 A.2d 889 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Cammarota v. Guerrera
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353, 358 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001). 4 The plaintiff alleged legal malpractice, but the labeling of the claim is not necessarily dispositive. “[T]he interpretation of pleadings is always a question of law *749 for the court ....
discussed Cited "see, e.g." LaPierre v. Mandell & Blau, M.D.'s, P.C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Backus Hospital, supra, 272 Conn. 562–63; see also Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilita- tion Center, 61 Conn. App. 353, 358 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gravius v. Klein (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Noncompliance alone will not support a judgment of contempt.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Rocque v. Design Land Developers of Milford, Inc., 82 Conn. App. 361, 370 , 844 A.2d 882 (2004); see also Bowers v. Bowers, 61 Conn. App. 75, 79 , 762 A.2d 515 (2000), appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 710 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Generally, expert testimony is required to establish both the standard of care to which the defendant is held and the breach of that standard.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Amsden v. Fischer, 62 Conn. App. 323, 331 , 771 A.2d 233 (2001); see also Trimel v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital Rehabilitation Center, 61 Conn. App. 353, 357-58 , 764 A.2d 203 , appeal dismissed, 258 Conn. 711 , 784 A.2d 889 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DONALD D. BOWERS
v.
FLORENCE IRENE BOWERS
SC 16473.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 11, 2001.
784 A.2d 889
Brian M. Silver, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Robert H. Weinstein, for the appellee (defendant).
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Donald D. Bowers, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment holding the plaintiff in contempt of court for wilfully violating the court’s order regarding a child support arrearage. Bowers v. Bowers, 61 Conn. App. 75, 762 A.2d 515 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs[*711] petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had properly concluded that the plaintiff had wilfully violated an order of the court?” Bowers v. Bowers, 255 Conn. 939, 767 A.2d 1121 (2001).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.